Results 1 to 2 of 2

EB Flatwound Strings; about Gauge

This is a discussion on EB Flatwound Strings; about Gauge within the Ernie Ball Strings forums, part of the Gear Talk category; Hello! I am a bassist who has used Ernie Ball strings for a very long time. I am now interested ...

  1. #1
    bad-metaphor is offline Registered User Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1

    EB Flatwound Strings; about Gauge

    Hello!

    I am a bassist who has used Ernie Ball strings for a very long time. I am now interested in flatwound strings because I am positive that it will give me the tone I am looking for and I have decided, after lots of digging and research, to go with Ernie Ball Flatwounds.

    My only issues, though; is that I play tuned down-sometimes tuned very down-and I like my strings to be heavy. Not just to increase the tension of the tuned-down strings, but I have grown to like the feel of heavier strings.

    Normally, I use the Power Slinkies (.50-.135) and I love them! Now, with the Flatwounds you can get for string sets going up to .55-.110, but the thickest B String you can get is .130.

    Now, I know the difference isn't much. Also, I have read that the tension of flatwound strings is higher than round wound, so maybe it's not a big deal? I am going to try the .45-.130 set regardless and I have not even the shadow of a doubt that I will love them. But what if I want something thicker? Will I want something thicker?? I'd love some advice from some more knowledge folk!

    Thank you!!

  2. #2
    eyecandy is offline Registered User Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    18
    flats have more tension than rounds.. like a standard set of roundwounds 45-105 have the same tension of a light gauge flats.. well that's in the case.. I haven't tried the Ernie Flats but they're pretty close to the D'Addario Chrome's tension..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •