Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70

StingRay Sound Examples

This is a discussion on StingRay Sound Examples within the Music Man Basses forums, part of the Gear Talk category; Since the question about the difference in sounds of the StingRay models came up every now and then, I recorded ...

  1. #1
    oli@bass's Avatar
    oli@bass is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,243

    Lightbulb StingRay Sound Examples

    Since the question about the difference in sounds of the StingRay models came up every now and then, I recorded some sound examples (of which some of you might recognize the bass line).

    All recording, drum programming, mixing and mp3 conversion was done in Logic Studio 9. The bass is recorded directly via Stealth Plug (not really a high quality interface, but sufficient). The drums are EXS24 software sampler instruments using high quality samples from several different sources (mainly Platinum 24 Drums and Natural Studio). The mix is compressed with the Adaptive Limiter using 3dB gain.

    StingRay 4 H, 2EQ, rosewood board (E13738, DOB 2000-04-04)
    Neck: Maple with rosewood board, oil & wax finish
    Body: Ash or poplar (could be poplar)
    Weight: 3,88 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set with about 2 hours of playing time on them
    Signal: The recording of the bass is completely unaltered.


    StingRay 4 H, 3EQ, Dargie Delight (E58536, DOB 2007-03-13)
    Neck: Maple with rosewood board, oil & wax finish
    Body: Ash
    Weight: 4,4 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set with about 2 hours of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.


    StingRay 4 HH, 3EQ (E66912, DOB 2008-08-21)
    Neck: Maple with rosewood board, oil & wax finish
    Body: Ash
    Weight: 4,34 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set with about 6 hours of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.
    • bass / treble at 50% (at center detent): This is a demo to show the different sounds of the HH configuration. Switching through the 5 positions of the pickup selector for the 5 sections of the demo, starting at position 1 (classic single bridge humbucker). The loudness between parts recorded with differenc pickups is not levelled and reflects switching without adapting volume on the bass.


    StingRay H, 3EQ, 100th Anniversary NAMM (B015498, DOB 2001-01-31)
    Neck: Graphite by Status Graphite, high gloss polyester finish
    Body: Ash, Alder or Poplar
    Weight: 4,48 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set (about 1 year old) with about 6 hours of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.



    StingRay H, 3EQ, 30th Anniversary (E55186, DOB 2006-06-19)
    Neck: Birdseye maple with rosewood board, high gloss polyester finish
    Body: Mahogany, string through body bridge
    Weight: 4,71 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set (about 18 month) with about 1 hour of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.



    StingRay H, 3EQ, 20th Anniversary (A01140, DOB 1996-05-23)
    Neck: Birdseye maple with maple board, oil & wax finish
    Body: Ash with quilted maple top
    Weight: 3,97 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set (about 12 month) with about 1 hour of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.



    StingRay HH, 3EQ, Ebony Edition (E72066, DOB 2009-03-12)
    Neck: Maple with ebony board, oil & wax finish
    Body: Mahogany, string through body bridge
    Weight: ca. 4,43 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set (about 12 month) with about 10 hours of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.



    StingRay 5 H, 3EQ, 20th Anniversary (F20712, DOB 2007-10-03)
    Neck: Maple with rosewood board, oil & wax finish
    Body: Ash with mahogany tone block and quilted maple top
    Weight: 4,83 kg
    Strings: Ernie Ball Super Slinky set (about 1 month) with about 3 hours of playing time on them
    Signal: Light compression (2.8:1 @ -6dB) used for mixdown to compensate loudness difference to 2EQ StingRay.



    Analysis
    • According to the frequency analyser in Logic, the 2 and 3 band preamps have the same center frequency (50 Hz) for the bass band. But the 2 band preamp boosts low frequencies from 100 Hz right down to 20 Hz (like a shelving filter), while the 3 band preamp has the maximum boost around 50 Hz and does not boost the ultra low frequencies.
    • Judging from the recorded levels and dynamics, it seems that the 2 band preamp is less dynamic and compresses the signal. However, it could be that I for some unknown reason I played with a lighter touch on the 2 band bass or that pickup height has some impact.
    • Both of the aforementioned characteristics lead to the aural impression of the 2 band preamp sounding more "warm", "punchy", "fat".
    • By properly adjusting the 3 band preamp, it can come very close to the sound of the 2 band preamp, but will never push out the massive ultra low bass frequencies. (This isn't a bad thing as such, because those ultra low frequencies will not be heard but need huge amounts of power to be reproduced and can cause damage to speakers).
    • The sound of the bridge humbucker on the HH sounds very close to the original single H. It's hard to tell whether any of the differences are due to string age, setup, differences in wood or really in the electronics.
    • The mid cut/boost with keeping the bass and treble at center detent (found in the examples of the NAMM Anniversary StingRay) shows to be very similar in sound to the complementary bass & treble cut/boost while keeping the mids at center. This is a very interesting option, e.g. if you tend to play always with a light treble and bass boost, cut the mids instead and up the volume a bit. It sounds even nicer to my ears.
    • The 30th Anniversary StingRay sounds awesome, even without a battery.
    • Interestingly the 20th Anniversary StingRay is not as bright as the maple neck and maple top on ash body suggests and sounds astonishingly similar to the 30th with a little less strengh in the mids and a lightly more aggressive top end when the treble is boosted.
    • Surprisingly, the Ebony Edition StingRay is not brighter as the ebony fretboard might suggest. To me, it sounds as if there are less upper mids and more upper hights.


    In the future, I'll try to add new recordings with different EBMM instruments, probably add more details on the settings used for recording and the analysis.
    Last edited by oli@bass; 11-23-2010 at 04:46 PM. Reason: added StingRay 5 20th
    Have bass. Will play.
    Looking for Sessions in Switzerland. Area: Züri/Winti/Rappi


    Music Man Collection Essentials
    MarkBass F1, SansAmp RBI, MarkBass Standard 104HR; MoMark (T1M/42S/MVV)@500, NY604; Minimark
    Holding down the bottom end for Redsteam

  2. #2
    shakinbacon is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    791
    very cool oli

    thanks
    2004 Saphire Black/White Pearloid Bongo 5HHp
    Bongo + Genz Benz Shuttle 6.0 + Epifani UL2-112 = Tone
    Review of Coated Slinkies here http://www.ernieball.com/forums/musi...-slinkies.html
    and flatwound Slinkies here http://www.ernieball.com/forums/musi...unds-nice.html
    Bongo EQ suggestions here http://www.ernieball.com/forums/musi...readsheet.html

  3. #3
    ekb16b's Avatar
    ekb16b is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    757
    Crap, now that bassline is gonna be in my head until i remember where its from.

    Thats awesome, thanks oli

  4. #4
    1kinal is offline Registered User Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    33
    That confirms me that I want a 2EQ...

  5. #5
    chilix's Avatar
    chilix is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    552
    love it!
    1988 EBMM Stingray 4 - 2EQ Trans Teal
    1989 EBMM Stingray 4 - 3EQ Sunburst
    1989 EBMM Stingray 4 Unlined Epoxied Fretless - 2EQ Black



  6. #6
    Rano Bass's Avatar
    Rano Bass is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Tijuana Mexico
    Posts
    1,103
    Quote Originally Posted by ekb16b View Post
    Crap, now that bassline is gonna be in my head until i remember where its from.
    Me too!
    They all sound like a Ray to me
    Stingray HH 5 natural maple DOB 05-02-06
    Mark Bass LM II

  7. #7
    fly's Avatar
    fly
    fly is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Abby/Beautiful British Columbia
    Posts
    1,681
    nice playin' oli...........thanks for the clips.
    2001 Sterling H/ black/black ice pg/rosewood board
    2003 SUB active white/black pg/rosewood board


    SterlingStudios

  8. #8
    Duarte's Avatar
    Duarte is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    2,010
    Great demo Oli, I'm sure this will help a lot of people out. Damn that 2EQ sounds good. It makes me want one of those Classic Sterlings.
    1994 Sterling The INVADER Bass
    "Money can't buy me love and that's true, but money can buy me drugs so that's cool" My Avatar...

  9. #9
    Kirby's Avatar
    Kirby is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,145
    Oli, what a great service you have done for those with questions. Right on my friend and great playing too!
    You can never have too many balls!

  10. #10
    ReB87's Avatar
    ReB87 is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    482
    That is some very interesting stuff Oli. Thanks a lot for researching this! In my opinion, the 2EQ sounds nicer. I have been wondering this for quite some time now, but never found a good side by side comparison. Hmm, need to go and look for a 2EQ Ray!
    Last edited by ReB87; 01-18-2010 at 07:26 AM.
    Ball's: Musicman SUB Bass
    Amps/Effects: Squier SP10 Amplitube 2, Ampeg SVX, Guitar Rig 3, Vox Amplug Lead, POD Studio UX2 + PODFarm

  11. #11
    kevins is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    429
    Awesome that you did this for everybody! but im still not a believer that the 2eq is more or less "warm" than the 3eq! good playing too!

    i noticed both at +100 sounded nearly identical, with the only real difference in sounds coming from what seemed to be very slight different variables(attack and what not). however i have heard that on the 3 eq the center position is not necessarily perfect +/- 0. knowing this i think that adding a minimal ammount of bass to it would have put it sounding exactly like the 2eq in the 0 position. but thats my opinion!


    hilariously enough though for my own needs here, if i did buy a 2eq id have to bump the 500 frequency on my amplifier to get that mid from the 3eq i like and if the 3eq doesnt get the underneath 50hz bass i have to bump the 33hz frequency(which id do) on my amp to give it a little more oomph the 2eq gets.

  12. #12
    CElton's Avatar
    CElton is offline Registered User Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by ekb16b View Post
    Crap, now that bassline is gonna be in my head until i remember where its from.

    Thats awesome, thanks oli
    It's the Lakland demo lick...only none of them sound as good as these.
    2007 SR5 H
    1982 SR4 H

    Mesa M6 Carbine
    Genz-Benz Shuttle 9.0
    Genz-Benz NeoX 212T

  13. #13
    danny-79's Avatar
    danny-79 is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    U.K Shropshire.
    Posts
    1,205
    Thanks for the post, good stuff an nice playing man!

    Stingray. 4H, Buttercreme 2005 L.E. (E46580, 05/05/05.) Coated Hybrid Slinky's.
    Stingray. 4H, Vintage Sunburst. (E47406, 31/05/05). Hybrid Slinky's.
    GENZ-BENZ. Amp's...

  14. #14
    Subscript is offline Registered User Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    63
    Definitely something I've wanted to hear!

  15. #15
    oli@bass's Avatar
    oli@bass is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,243
    New examples for the 100th NAMM Anniversary StingRay, with additional clips for the mid control. Hear the sound of graphite!



    The mid cut/boost with keeping the bass and treble at center detent (found in the examples of the NAMM Anniversary StingRay) shows to be very similar in sound to the complementary bass & treble cut/boost while keeping the mids at center. This is a very interesting option, e.g. if you tend to play always with a light treble and bass boost, cut the mids instead and up the volume a bit. It sounds even nicer to my ears
    Have bass. Will play.
    Looking for Sessions in Switzerland. Area: Züri/Winti/Rappi


    Music Man Collection Essentials
    MarkBass F1, SansAmp RBI, MarkBass Standard 104HR; MoMark (T1M/42S/MVV)@500, NY604; Minimark
    Holding down the bottom end for Redsteam

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •