Welcome to the forum!
If you're used to a Soloist, the closest you will get is a JP. So I think you're on the right track. I played a Soloist and for a long time. They're still very different guitars, but the JP is going to be the closest you will get to a Soloist.
The reason I say this is mainly the neck profile. The JP has a thin, flat neck much like the Soloist does. They're not identical. To me, the Soloist neck feels a bit thinner. The SL1 and SL2 are also neck-thru where all of the EBMM guitars are bolt-on. Just something to keep in mind you're particularly accustomed to the complete lack of heel on USA Jacksons.
You'd also be making the switch from Seymour Duncan to DiMarzio. To me, this is an upgrade, but that's just my opinion. I think the Crunch Lab and Liquifire pickups which come on the JP now are killer. And depending on whether you had an SL1 or SL2, you could be going from HSS to HH configuration. This may not be as big of a deal if you're going to be riding the bridge pup a lot, but if you're accustomed to a single in the neck, you'll notice some tonal difference.
One aspect of the JP which is a HUGE advantage is the versatility. If you get it with a piezo, you add a whole new dimension to the guitar. If you were to choose the BFR, you get another option with the push/pull tone pot. So while it's a great guitar for metal, it's also quite suitable for other styles.
My advice in this matter would be do play a JP. Find a shop nearby or within a reasonable distance who carries EBMM and try one out. Take your Soloist with you and make the comparison for yourself. The only person who can really decide is you.
If you're like me, you'll choose the JP.




Reply With Quote






Bookmarks