Results 1 to 5 of 5

Ernie Ball v. Paul Reed Smith

This is a discussion on Ernie Ball v. Paul Reed Smith within the Music Man Guitars forums, part of the Gear Talk category; Ernie Ball Music man vs. Paul Reed Smith Whose guitars do you like better and why?...

  1. #1
    seandorian is offline Registered User Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atascadero
    Posts
    33

    Ernie Ball v. Paul Reed Smith

    Ernie Ball Music man vs. Paul Reed Smith

    Whose guitars do you like better and why?

  2. #2
    Jimi D's Avatar
    Jimi D is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ottawa ON
    Posts
    1,966
    I like both, play both... They're the two justifiable "contemporary classics" in production guitars, imho... I think the two companies approach the instrument from very different directions, but they both produce beautiful and highly playable guitars with unique tones and personalities. I don't think you can lose with either, but my main guitar is an Axis.

  3. #3
    hbucker's Avatar
    hbucker is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    676

    Cool

    My evaluation of PRS probably isn't valid because I just don't have that much experience with them. Also, I own an EVH so that style of guitar is what I'm use to although I have several guitars which I like a lot that have varying neck styles and feels. So just because a guitar is different than the Axis/EVH feel doesn't mean that I'll pan it.

    I've probably picked up about 5 PRS guitars. 4 were in a store and one belonged to a friend of mine. None of them felt very good to me. The action was high compared to the guitars I own and they just felt clunky to me. I won't argue with their tone or their beauty. They really do have a lot going for them but to me the feel was unrefined compared to what I'm use to.

    Also, PRS seems too much like the flavor of the day for rock bands any more. IMO you can't get a more trendy guitar right now. Obviously that doesn't make them bad but you have to wonder any time everyone has to own one kind of guitar.

    To be fair to both guitars, I don't see them as similar at all other than they are both basically rock guitars that generally have beautiful wood used in their construciton. After that, the similarities are few and far between.

  4. #4
    nobozos's Avatar
    nobozos is offline Registered User Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Pekin, Illinois
    Posts
    673
    For what it's worth, here's my 2 cents.

    I owned a few different Wolfgangs, and then switched to the Axis, which I perosnally thought was a better guitar. I played the Axis for over a year, but always thought that I was missing out on something because I didn't own a PRS.
    I had an opportunity to trade my Axis +$200 for a 1994 (pre-mass produced) PRS Custom 24, so I jumped at the chance because I had always heard how great PRS was.

    I thought the set-up and playability of the guitar was good, but I noticed right away that there were certian spots on the neck that didn't sustain as well as my old Axis. I also thought that the acoustic tone of the guitar unplugged wasn't as resonant as the Axis. I didn't let it bother me too much because I thought I owned the Rolls Royce of guitars.

    The PRS does have excellent playability and intonation qualities, and it is a beautiful guitar. For someone that plays mostly leads, I believe it is probably one of the best guitars one could get.

    Now is where the story takes a turn. I was really happy with the guitar until I played my first gig. I play mostly rythym, and spend a lot of time holding chords at the far end of the neck. I started to notice at the beginning of the third set that my hand was really fatigued. I wrote it off as just getting used to the neck. After the same thing happened at every gig for a month, I started to think there was a little more to it than just getting used to the neck.
    I started to examine my hand position on the PRS vs. my hand position on the Axis. I found that my wrist was kind of cocked at an odd angle when playing chords at the end of the neck on the PRS. I believe it is the overall length of the guitar that puts the end of the neck a little farther away that caused my problem.

    The problem didn't go away in 2 months, so I went to Guitar Center and traded it in on a Purple Axis, which I swear by and play to this day.

    I've owned both, and I personally prefer the Axis. I've played a lot of Ernie Ball stuff at guitar stores, and I've never found a guitar that sounds bad, or is set up wrong. Every Axis I've ever played pretty much plays the same as any other one I've tried.
    I've also tried a lot of different PRS guitars, and think that they are also pretty consistent, and high quality guitars.

    The conclusion is that they are both high quality guitars, and it's really up to your personal preference to decide which is better.

    IMHO, the quality of both instruments is top notch, and the biggest difference is price. I feel if you can get the same quality for $1000.00 less, that would be the way to go. My individual preference is the Axis.

  5. #5
    SteveK is offline Registered User Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6
    I'm new to EB guitars having just won an Axis Super Sport at the local GC today. It feels great and the sound is there, but before commenting, I'll have to spend some time with it. That said, my main guitars are all PRS. I've got a Hollowbody II, McCarty Rosewood, Custom 22 Soapbar, and a Swamp Ash Special. Oh yeah, I've also got an American Tele with Barden pickups, and a Martin acoustic. My PRS guitars are all 22 fret with the wide fat neck carve and they never cause me any pain or fatigue. Just different strokes I guess. Anyhoo...glad I found this place, and hope to meet some new friends here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •