• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

Asomodai

Active member
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
29
Hey guys.

Just recieved a 92/93 Stingray 5 fretless. I peered under the pickup and spied that it didnt appear to have a third coil. I had a later SR5 before and it had a very obvious route for a third coil. Did SR5's always have Phantom coils? There appears to be no extra routing in this SR for it!


Heres a picture without the pup cover on.

dscf2143r.jpg

dscf2144.jpg


Underside of pickup
dscf2146m.jpg


Routing
dscf2147.jpg


Cheers!

Rob.
 

Thornton Davis

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
356
Location
Toronto
My understanding is that the phantom coil was added in 1991. Any SR5's made prior to then would not have one installed. But then there are always exceptions.

TD
 

Rod Trussbroken

Moderator
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
5,130
Location
Bris Vegas. AUSTRALIA.
The earlier SR5 pickups had no dummy coil. Around 1992 the pole pieces changed from Alnico to Ceramic. At the same time a dummy coil was added along with a new pre-amp. I think it was last year that the pole pieces went back to Alnico.
 

Jornan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
105
Location
Norway
The phantom coil is under the pickguard, but I thought only HS models had it?
 

5Stringer

Ernie Ball Customer Service
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
3,386
Location
San Luis Obispo, Ca
That is correct, the current SR5 H models do not have the phantom coil, because there is no need. They are never in single-coil mode. The SC mode that was on the earlier SR5s was replaced by an Enhanced Parallel setting.

Dan
 

5Stringer

Ernie Ball Customer Service
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
3,386
Location
San Luis Obispo, Ca
My understanding is that the phantom coil was added in 1991. Any SR5's made prior to then would not have one installed. But then there are always exceptions.

TD

The earlier SR5 pickups had no dummy coil. Around 1992 the pole pieces changed from Alnico to Ceramic. At the same time a dummy coil was added along with a new pre-amp. I think it was last year that the pole pieces went back to Alnico.

Gav is correct. The phantom coil/ceramic magnet configuration started in 1992, though you will find both types made that year, as evidenced with this thread. My belief is it was in late 1992 that the change occurred.

Dan
 

5Stringer

Ernie Ball Customer Service
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
3,386
Location
San Luis Obispo, Ca
Hey guys.

Just recieved a 92/93 Stingray 5 fretless. I peered under the pickup and spied that it didnt appear to have a third coil. I had a later SR5 before and it had a very obvious route for a third coil. Did SR5's always have Phantom coils? There appears to be no extra routing in this SR for it!

Rob.

Apparently that is true. This is the latest one I have seen without the phantom coil. As mentioned earlier, the original SR5 did not have a phantom coil, which was added later.

Dan
 

Basscake

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
149
Location
@ home
Apparently that is true. This is the latest one I have seen without the phantom coil. As mentioned earlier, the original SR5 did not have a phantom coil, which was added later.

Dan

Intersting. I never knew that.

Just out of curiosity:
What did the 3 way switch do on those early modells if there was no dummy coil. Series, parallel and what else? Pure Singlecoil with the hum?
 

5Stringer

Ernie Ball Customer Service
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
3,386
Location
San Luis Obispo, Ca
History of the StingRay 5

The SR5 was originally to be similar to the StingRay 4 in that it had essentially the same alnico pickup and preamp combo. At this same time, we had just finished development of the 3-band EQ system. We didn't want it to be simply a replica of a StingRay, simply having an extra string. Remember, we were still kind of new at this Music Man thing and this was the first EBMM bass we were making from the ground up. We wanted it to have something extra, so we thought having a 3-way switch to go from parallel (the original SR sound) , single-coil, and series would be a cool thing. And it was so, and the first SR5s started shipping in late 1987.

However, after a while it was apparent there was a noise issue in the single-coil mode and that was not what we wanted. So after a few years of experiments, trials and tribulations, it was decided to go to ceramic /ferrite pole pieces. That smoothed out the sound, and helped quiet that single coil a bit, though not enough. At the same time, the Sterling bass was being R&D'd and there was some experimentation with something called a Phantom Coil. So it was added to the StingRay 5 sometime in late 1992 (don't have the exact dates) although we see some w/o the phantom as late as early 1993. So the phantom coil was added, and it remained that way until March 2008, at least on the original H version. Even though in Oct. 2006 the look of the pickup and pickguard changed slightly, the essence of the electronics remained unchanged until March 2008.

In January 2008, the long-anticipated Sterling 5 was introduced. Until that point, for the prior 15 years, the Sterling and the StingRay 5 essentially had the same electronics. It made sense to us that the Sterling 4/5 and the StingRay 4/5 should match each other. So ... we essentially moved the electronics that were in the StingRay 5 into the Sterling 5. We then started putting alnico magnets back into the StingRay 5 as in the beginning, coming full circle, so to speak - with one difference. The single-coil setting, which had proved so bothersome in the beginning, was replaced by a more ballsy Enhanced Parallel setting, eliminating the need for a phantom coil, at least on the single H version.

Meanwhile, at Summer NAMM 2006, we came out with dual-pickup versions of StingRay, StingRay 5, and Sterling models. At this point, all StingRay 5s still had ceramic magnets. All StingRay 5's - in H, HH, and HS pickup configurations - made the jump from ceramic to alnico magnets and corresponding preamp in the aforementioned March 2008.

Out of the 3 pickup configurations, the HS (hum/single coil) version is the only one that still uses the phantom coil - because it is the only one of the three that employs a pickup in the single-coil position. However, instead of gluing it to the pickup, it is now directly under the pickguard in between the two live pickups, eliminating any need to rout out deeper into the body to accommadate the phantom coil.

Hope that explains most if not all!

Dan
 
Last edited:

Petebass

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Messages
19
Sorry to rehash an old thread, but I've been caught out by this difference recently. I bought a 1990 SR5 recently as a backup to my 1991 SR5. I didn't realise at the time that the SR5 had a 2 coil alnico pickup as opposed to the 3 coil ceramic pickup on my 1991 bass. My fault, I didn't research it properly.

The basses sound very different to each other. So different in fact that I was convinced my 3 position slider on the 1990 bass has a different control function than the 1991 bass. Apparently not according to a previous post in this thread.

But the position nearest the neck on the 1990 SR5 seems about half the volume of the other positions. Is this normal or does my bass have a fault?
 

Movielife

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
1,340
Location
North West, UK
Thanks for bumping this...this is very useful!

Do the current stingray 5 single h not have a single coil at bridge slider selection now?! If it does not...I definitely need a Stingray HS so I can solo the bridge back coil.
 

mynan

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
2,663
Location
Spring Lake, MI
Do the current stingray 5 single h not have a single coil at bridge slider selection now?

That's correct. The new H SR5s do not have a single-coil setting, but if you like that setting on the older SR5s (91-08) the H Sterling5s do offer that setting as well as the ceramic pickups that the 91-08 SR5s had.
 

drTStingray

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
1,833
Location
Kent, United Kingdom
the position nearest the neck on the 1990 SR5 seems about half the volume of the other positions. Is this normal or does my bass have a fault?

I think the position nearest the neck should be humbucker in series - it should sound slightly louder and definitely fatter in that position than the others (but I can really only go by the ceramic version - I've never played an early SR5 with Alnico - I think the switch has the same function though).
 

Petebass

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Messages
19
I think the position nearest the neck should be humbucker in series - it should sound slightly louder and definitely fatter in that position than the others (but I can really only go by the ceramic version - I've never played an early SR5 with Alnico - I think the switch has the same function though).
Thanks for that. I guess I'll have to take it to get looked at. I have a day off tomorrow so I'll drop it off to my trusty bass tech and see what he can do.
 

Murphy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
87
Location
Toronto
Just to clarify.
My Sr5 20th anni HS models only have a dummy coil under the S pickup.
There is no single coil , bridge pickup option.
 
Top Bottom