• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

alban.dunford

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
7
I have 2 Lukes.
the first has an amazing neck but the second one has a much thinner neck.
Can anyone tell me what the model is and why the neck is much thinner. IMG_0953.jpg IMG_0952 (1).jpg
 

DrKev

Moderator
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
7,181
Location
Somewhere between Paris, Dublin, and Buffalo
Those Lukes look both like standard Lukes (i.e. Luke IIs). There are small differences from neck to neck feel due to the hand sanding in the factory and some forumites here will say, like you, that they have slightly different thickness necks, but there was never a change in production dimensions.

And welcome to the forum family!
 

mikeller

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
2,761
Location
Central Ohio
As DrKev said - it is a standard Luke II but with the optional piezo.

I had one exactly like it (same finish and piezo) and I thought the neck felt small too - the V shape was more pronounced I think and that led it to feeling smaller. Great guitar and amazing sounding just the same!
 

alban.dunford

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
7
Definitely not the same neck. My first Luke has a wider an thicker neck than this one.
The strings are a lot closer together Luke.jpg
I guess its difficult to see, but i will measure the width of the two necks. and strings
 
Last edited:

beej

Moderator
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
11,984
Location
Toronto, Canada
There shouldn't be any difference in the width - the necks are CNC produced to the same specs. But as Kev says, they're hand sanded so they can feel thicker or thinner, or with a slightly different profile.
 

MikeVt

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
1,663
Location
Vermont
Could one be counterfeit? From the pics, it almost looks like the blade selectors are in different positions on the body.

Mike
 

alban.dunford

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
7
Ok.. Thanks to John Quinn from musicman.
They are both Luke 2
I measured the neck and surprised myself.
Although the neck is thinner ( the first Luke has a deeper V on the neck) the fretboard is the same.
I must say it feels much thinner in my hands.
The difference is only a few mm but the older Luke has this fantastic neck.
The older one is batch no. 915 and the new one no.916 (1999 model and 2010 model)
 

michaeld13

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
74
One looks to have a thicker rosewood(?) top... Not sure from the photo. Which do you reach for more often- your JP or LK? Looks like a rock' amp you have there.
 

alban.dunford

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
7
The light blue Luke is my go to guitar, but all three have a different sound.. depending on what i want to play.
The JP is an amazing guitar but the Luke has the balls.
Playing through a Peavey JSX into a marshal 4 x 12.
It has a super clean sound ... but the crunch a lead channel are insane
 
Top Bottom