Beth said:
Yes, she is an idol contestant. She was one of the top 2 but lost to Tayor Hicks. I don't need to say Hail Jimi for anything that I watch, I watch what I want and I refuse to be judged for it. I like American Idol because it shows what talent is out there and how they fit into today's music industry. It's really valuable having experts like Simon Cowell and Randy Jackson tellin' it like it is directly to the contestants' faces. And, it being packaged in a nice, cheesy format that's digestible for all viewers has made it the #1 show on television.
Beth,
After writing my last entry, I walked away from the computer. It seemed that your reply insinuated that you were somewhat insulted from my looking down at American Idol, and its success. I didn't mean to insult anyone except maybe the powers that be at the big record companies. It definitely was not my intention to "judge" you, or the contestants. I apologize for any slight.
Anyhow, I do need to thank you for something, which is this: I couldn't get what you wrote off my mind, and was forced to take some time to consider exactly what it is about the whole American Idol phenomenon that seems to get under my skin and bother me so much.
You seem to feel I am questioning the talent of AI contestants; not at all. I'm sure once they get the group down to the top 100 or so, they are all very talented (and probably are all capable of making a hit record). Show business, and the fringes of show business, is chock full of thousands of immensely talented individuals. I never questioned their talent, I just said the show is not
about talent, it's about marketability. Prove me wrong.
As far as having "experts" like Simon, Paula, and Randy, "tellin' it like it is" - hogwash. What makes them any more qualified than you or I to judge this show is beyond me. They are entertaining to watch, and together comprise a good ensemble, but "experts"? Hmmm... Just because someone is put forth to you as an "expert", don't unquestioningly accept that as fact.
In considering what to write here, I looked up the backround of all three of them. Simon started out as a record producer, then came to prominence on Pop Idol, the British forerunner to American Idol. Paula was a dance choreographer who then became a pop singer. Randy was a bass player in some respected bands. All bass player jokes aside, Randy is the only one I would personally respect one iota as a musician. Paula is a musician like Britney Spears is a musician. They sang on pop records with hired studio guns. Just because you can sing doesn't make you a musician. And producing records takes an ability to recognize musical talent, I'll give you that one, but is more about making a record that will sell. Which again, I'll say to you is the reason for AI's exsistence.
Next, it bugs me as a musician that the contestants are passed off to the American public as musicians. What I would put forth is that most of those people are entertainers, not musicians. A subjective matter, to be sure, and sometimes there's a fine line between the two. Interacting musically with others, truly making music, makes one a musician. Karaoke singers are NOT musicians! To me, Miles Davis was a musician, Diana Krall is a musician, Tom Petty is a musician, Albert Lee is a musician. Madonna is an entertainer, Christina Aguilera is an entertainer, The BackStreet Boys are entertainers, and most certainly Kelly Clarkson is an entertainer. I readily admit that this is something very open to opinion, and mine is no more valid than anyone else's, but I dare say that with this being a musician's forum, most of those here are probably of a similar opinion, so I suppose I'm preaching to the choir. That is one reason your reply to my original post caught me so offguard; I just wasn't expecting that on a musician's forum.
Like much of the music that sells well, most of the music on Idol, and almost all of the music put out by former Idol winners, is Pop music. Which brings me to my final point, your comment about "how they fit into today's music industry". Exactly! THAT is what I don't like about Idol! Today's music industry is mostly drivel, geared to the lowest common denominator, to be digestible by the masses. I.E., let's sell as many records as possible. Ask any record producer, including Simon - don't bring in a single at 4 minutes and 1 second; it's marketing suicide to bring in a tune not under 4 minutes long. It is all about money, it is NOT about music. If three million people would pay $17.00 for a book of cartoons, we'd have the show American Cartoonist. Those recording industry moguls don't care a whiff about the music, they want the dollars. But the public keeps gobbling it up.
I'm not going to change that, you're not going to change that, all the players here on the EBMM forum aren't going to change that, and sadly, the EBMM endorsors aren't either. It's an old story, but as a musician I find it tragic that Eric Johnson, John Petrucci, Albert Lee, Diana Krall, Joe Bonamassa, Susan Tedeschi, and others are relative unknowns, but everyone knows Kelly Clarkson, who isn't one tenth the musician that those others are. That's pop culture, what can you say?
Do I sound like a crotchety old man about this? A music snob? Hahaha, probably. Guilty as charged. But I bet you could find thousands of 20-something bar band musicians who sound like this too. (And I'm not
that old)
By the way, if you want to see "What talent is out there", go to the Montreux Jazz Festival, the New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival, a symphony performance, any music educator's conference, The Chicago Blues Fest, or a convention of the Sweet Adelines. Or for that fact, go to the nearest yuppie bar and watch the Friday night dance band.
This whole Pop Music matter reminds me of a story about Miles. I'm paraphrasing here, as I don't have the actual quote handy, but Miles Davis was once accosted after a performance by a woman who had been among the audience. She said to him, "I don't get it, that was awful. I just don't get it."
Miles looked her in the eye, and replied, "I've worked 30 years perfecting my craft. How do you expect to understand it after five minutes?"
Kane