• Security notice: Ernie Ball staff will never send you a direct message about a prize or giveaway, and will never ask you to click a link to "claim" anything.
    If you receive a message like that - even from an account whose name looks official - do not click the link. Please report it using the Report link on the message so the moderators can act. A scam campaign impersonating admin accounts was blocked on 29 July 2026; those accounts are banned and their messages have been deleted.

Gibosn loses in Supreme court

Big Poppa

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
18,598
Location
Coachella & SLO, California
Gibson loses in Supreme court

Hi Sterling,

Paul Smith asked me to forward this to you, with our thanks for your ongoing support.

Sincerely,

Debra J. Wolstein
Executive Assistant to Paul Reed Smith

PRS Guitars
380 Log Canoe Circle
Stevensville, MD 21666
(410) 643-9970 Ext. 175
[email protected]


-- PRESS RELEASE --
Contact: Rebecca Eaddy

PR/Media Manager

PRS Guitars, Ltd.

410-643-9970, ext 114

[email protected]

www.prsguitars.com



Singlecut



Supreme Court Ends Gibson Lawsuit Against PRS



(STEVENSVILLE, MD) June 5, 2006 — Paul Reed Smith Guitars is very pleased to announce that the United States Supreme Court today denied Gibson Guitar's final appeal of a Court of Appeals decision upholding PRS' right to make a single cutaway-style guitar. When first introduced more than six years ago at the NAMM show, the PRS Singlecut® quickly captured the attention of artists and critics, winning awards for its design and quality. Seeking to stop competition to its Les Paul brand single cutaway-style guitar, Gibson moved aggressively, filing a suit in Nashville that asserted trademark infringement. After several years of expensive and drawn-out litigation, the local federal district court judge initially sided with Gibson. That court ordered PRS to stop sales of its Singlecut®. Several companies joined PRS in urging the appellate court--the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit--to reverse the decision. Last year, the Sixth Circuit ruled that an injunction should never have been issued by the lower court. The court observed that Gibson conceded that only "an idiot" would ever confuse a PRS Singlecut® and a Gibson Les Paul. Based on that concession and the overwhelming evidence, the Sixth Circuit found that Gibson's trademark case had no merit and summarily dismissed the suit. The Supreme Court's decision today leaves the Sixth Circuit opinion in place and ends Gibson's multi-year effort to thwart legitimate competition under the guise of intellectual property law.



Paul Reed Smith, the company founder, stated: "I am delighted for our employees, our dealers, our customers and the industry. Everyone was extremely supportive of our cause and our company over the last six years, fully embracing our decision to fight back against Gibson's charges." Smith added: "My thanks especially go to those in the industry who helped educate the court: the media, our industry peers, guitar craftsmen and industry scholars. Their help was invaluable.”



Photo: PRS Singlecut® attached



####



Just keeping you kids current!
 
Last edited:
BP, thanx, that's great to hear!! Nice to see that things worked out for the better and forever one than the corporate conglomorite.

Glenn |B)
 
BP,

I was following that case because my Business Law professor and I discussed it and researched it pretty thoroughly last semester. It was really interesting to see how the prices for the PRS SINGLECUTS skyrocketted on Ebay when they were forced the stop production.




Pug
 
Thank goodness the buck stops here.

Now you Gibby fellas watch your LP prices go up to pay for all that litigation! :D
 
I admire that you support your fellow guitar makers and the fact that you understand that businesses can coexist, support each other and succeed instead of trying to crush each other. Very progressive business thinking BP.

Congrats to PRS

>^..^<
 
By the way - while were on the subject . . . I would like you permission to buy a PRS 22/12.

What'ya think?

I'm still hoping for the maple topped Petrucci, but since you don't make a production 12 string . . .;)
 
It's good news for PRS and great news for the industry as a whole - now that a precendent has been established, I presume this means that guitars from competing manufacturers can be similar to an existing model so long as they're not slavish or blatant copies. I mean, it's not like PRS ever wanted to misrepresent the Singlecut as a Les Paul ("Les Paul killer", maybe, but not a Les Paul per sé)... Anyway, I wish Fender would go after someone big enough to fight back - the way FMIC have been beating up on the boutique bolt-on guys is enough to make you sick... None of them have the financial clout to hire the legal wherewithall to stand up to the big "F", of course, so they're basically bullied into complying with Fender's wishes, however unreasonable they may be...
 
Gibson basses?

I always knew that Gibson made great huge planks of wood with strings attached. But I never thought they could be classified as 'basses". And now you tell me they make guitars as well? Say it ain't so! What is this world coming to?

Ritchie
 
At last common sense prevails......

Well done PRS, shame on you Gibson - try making a better product!

Dave
 
As an owner of both PRS and EBMM I can say I am very happy that this case is over (finally). Although the SC isn't my cup of tea, it sure is an amazing guitar that smokes an LP hands down.

One thing that EBMM and PRS have in common is their dedication to super high quality production consistency across the board. These are the best two guitar companies at reaching that goal, bar none. For exampl, when I pick up an EBMM or a PRS in a store, I don't have to worry about cutting the side of my hand on the frets sticking out....:mad:
 
I keep telling you guys that most of the manufacturers are respectful and very friendly. We kind of share a compeetitive comraderie. For you sparkle nuts...The year I showed the sparkles at NAMM Paul Smith came in and said they were the best he had seen even better than the few he made. His words were "I hope you do better with them than I did, Sparkles dont sell"
 
Is Gibson gonna pay all of PRS's legal fees on this one?
Can't imagine that was a cheap one to fight.

What I wouldn't do to see a group SUPREME COURT photo, all playing PRS's!
How cool would that be to see.

Maybe Ruth Bader on the Bongo. :p
 
awesome .......Way to go PRS and Thanx for Passing THE REAL info Sterling .....sometimes we hear to much and dont see enough .....you just gave us both.
 
phatduckk said:
thats cool. i had a PRS and it was a rad guitar ... I never played it enough so i let it go to a better home

im glad they won


i havent heard "rad" since the 80's...:D
 
Back
Top