Knox said:

And I thought the Silo was a non artist related guitar.....other than the silo and the Axis all the others are signatures!
The Luke is a great guitar that anyone can own without being in Lukes shadow! Its so versatile and flexible for all music styles, and I'm pretty sure that as with all the EBMM sig models, their users do not solely buy these models because of the artist they are related with....
The Silo has no Artist signature on the head stock.
I know the Luke is awesome---I own one---because of the shape, neck feel, and EMG's. Having Luke's name on it as co-designer and endorser is just a bonus. Tristan is hitting the big-time and the media can be quite harsh in labeling him as a Luke copy just because of the guitar he plays, he's endorsed by Luke on his website, Tristan praises Luke as a primary influence etc....(I DON'T consider Tristan as any of this because I've heard all his clips and I love his music on it's own.) The media can be/is a bit**, and is very ruthless. If they were to harp on this point for all of Tristan's career, I can see the pressure setting in to try something else.
That's why I posted the original statement. I was just wondering if the media, or any other pressure, was a factor to using the Silo as his now number one after saying that the Luke was "it." End of explanation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More questions for Tristan:
1. Can you describe the difference in necks between the Silo and Luke in your opinion?
2. Will you be changing pickups in the Silo, or are you satisfied?
3. Do you prefer the hum,single,single pickup configuration in any current/future guitar?
4. Is everything set up to the Luke's spec's on the Silo?
Thanks