passive S.U.B.?

[fresnorich]

Anyone know why MM decided to offer a passive version of this bass? And why is the 2-band pre-amp version only like $50 more?

I don't think they've ever offered a passive Stingray, so what's the deal?

I actually like passive basses, but all the reviews I've read say to go for the active version.

So, how does the passive S.U.B. compare to the active soundwise? And who are they trying to market this bass to?
(It just might be me.)

 

[Aussie Mark]

My understanding is that the SUB is marketed as a cheap alternative to a Stingray, for people who are hearing impaired, color blind and have bad taste in pickguards.

 

[easelkillya]

Amen to that. I don't like the sound of the passive SUB at all. I thought the active one sounded great, though. As for the finish, I don't like it much. The pickguards are kinda neat. If you're into passive basses, I guess it's as good as any other. I'm not into the passive sound, so don't take my opinion for much.

 

[basspastor]

passive sub

They are marketing them to anyone that will buy one; you, me , and several hundred others. If you believe everything you read about, see you on the moon in an old 55 chevy.
My opinion and everyone has one of these also;the passive sub is alright.I LIKE MINE.