• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

zuma

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
174
Location
East Los Angeles
I would rather ask here than the Strings forum...

What IS the plural for Slinky?

Slinkys
or Slinkies?

Show your work or the answer doesn't count. :D
 

Powman

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
1,086
Location
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
From Wiktionary:

slinky
See also Slinky
Contents [hide]
1 English
1.1 Pronunciation
1.2 Adjective
1.3 Noun
[edit]English

[edit]Pronunciation
Rhymes: -ɪŋki
[edit]Adjective
slinky (comparative slinkier, superlative slinkiest)

furtive, stealthy or catlike
[edit]Noun
slinky (plural slinkies)
 

maddog

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
4,463
Location
Albuquerque
"Slinkys?"

from the FAQ:

Q: What are the differences between plain, RPS, nickelwound (Slinky), pure nickel (Classic Slinky), stainless steel, phosphor bronze (Slinky Acoustic), 80/20 bronze (Earthwood) and nylon (Ernesto Palla) strings?
A: These are the differences between our strings: Plain strings (the smaller unwound strings), 3 are included in most electric sets and 2 in most acoustic sets, are a tin-plated steel string offering smooth high notes. RPS (Reinforced Plain Strings) strings are simply reinforced versions of our standard plain strings. They have a special wrapping of bronze wire with a lock twist at the ball end where breakage most often occurs. Since they also help the string stay in tune, these are especially useful for players using a vintage-style tremolo or just the player who tends to break a lot of plain strings. However, there is no real tone difference when using these strings. The differences in the various Slinky sets are in the wrapped strings only, and they are as follows: Nickelwound, which is nickel plating over steel wrap, such as our standard Slinkys?, offer all-around good midrange tone and sound. Pure Nickel strings offer a smoother, rounder vintage tone, reminiscent of the 60's. Classic Slinkys? are available in this type of wrap. Stainless Steel is a brighter string for more cutting tones. These are available in the Stainless Steel Slinkys? For acoustic guitars, the two most popular types are 80/20 bronze, and Phosphor Bronze. Earthwood 80/20 bronze gives a player a brighter, dynamic sound with lots of clarity. Earthwood Silk & Steel has a nylon core for the wound strings to add a mellower characteristic to the 80/20 sound. It also lessens the tension, making the guitar easier to play. Our Slinky Acoustic strings are a phosphor bronze blend string, giving players a warm, rich sound with solid tone while reducing string noise. Nylon strings are a smooth, rich string, quieter than most other strings (for classical style guitars only.) They are available in our Ernesto Palla Silver & Clear, Silver & Black, and Gold & Black (ball end). Also available in our Earthwood line is Gold & Clear (ball end).

I'm not sure what the "?" is in there for. Maybe the copy editor was unsure as well.

The Wiktionary reference given isn't referring to the trademarked brand of strings.

I lean towards Slinkys.

if you're really fretting about this, play more bass.

pun intended.
 
Last edited:

Steve-O

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
72
More importantly, what's the plural of Music Man? Music Men? Music Mans?
 

Jemi9OD

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
14
Location
Durham, NC, USA
I would rather ask here than the Strings forum...

What IS the plural for Slinky?

Slinkys
or Slinkies?

Show your work or the answer doesn't count. :D

This is hilarious to me because for holidays today I got a 14 karat gold-plated commemorative Slinky. ;) For a good two or three minutes solid, I kept wondering how interesting it was that a slinky reference made it to the EB forums!
 
S

sitonmybass

Slinkyz. Slinkees. Slinkeez.
I'd love to "show my work," but my brain doesn't work half of the time anyway. :rolleyes:
 

oli@bass

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
4,272
Location
Switzerland
How about the genitive case

"Slinky's" or "Music Man's"

It would be grammatically and semantically correct in keeping the original spelling and pointing at the plural of an omitted subject ("strings", "basses"). Wouldn't it?
 
Top Bottom