drop_d
Active member
I was just fanning the flames of neighborly hate with the EX turned up to what (to me) was a reasonable level when I happened to look down at the neck. Since it was my first EBMM, I didn't really notice it at first, but there is a clear line between the fingerboard and the neck. It is such an obvious joint, it could even be a different piece of wood. On my US EBMMs (maple fingerboard guitars, anyway) it is almost impossible to see where the fingerboard is replaced after the trussrod groove was routed and the rod inserted. It doesn't affect the playing or the sound, but it is a very noticeable cosmetic difference. Which begs the question of why I didn't notice until now and if it took this long to notice something this obvious, where does that leave my taste test . . . but we won't go there.
If they cut corners on the fingerboards, I wonder about the tops--especially as pretty as the top is. One of these days when I have the neck off--not that I see any reason to do that in the foreseeble future, I'll check out the maple top to see if it is the same thickness as the EVH and SLO AXIS.
I don't know if this info is interesting to anyone, since they probably don't have EXs in the US. Who knows though, the question might pop up in the future . . .
. . . then again,
dd
If they cut corners on the fingerboards, I wonder about the tops--especially as pretty as the top is. One of these days when I have the neck off--not that I see any reason to do that in the foreseeble future, I'll check out the maple top to see if it is the same thickness as the EVH and SLO AXIS.
I don't know if this info is interesting to anyone, since they probably don't have EXs in the US. Who knows though, the question might pop up in the future . . .
. . . then again,
dd