DavidOfOz
Well-known member
Hi guys
Apologies if this question is dumb, ignorant, or subjects you to my obsessive-compulsive drive to understand the universe in minute and useless detail…I’m just curious…
I’m saving up for my first ever EBMM…probably a Luke, though I’m considering a Petrucci as an alternative. I could probably order a standard model today, but those BFRs have me drooling. So my choice is: buy a standard model soon, or keep saving for another quarter-lifetime to get a BFR. (I am so jealous of you guys who have EBMM collections!!)
The problem for me is that EBMM guitars are extremely hard to find in stores around Melbourne (Australia), especially in the south-eastern/peninsular suburbs. Seems like no one stocks them. It’s hard enough to get hold of a standard Luke or Petrucci to try let alone a BFR model. So comparison is impossible for me, which leads me to my question…
Do the BFR models sound any different to the standard models? I mean, I'm far from an expert, but the construction of a guitar and the timber it is made from affect things like tone and sustain. The maple top on a BFR is (obviously) a different construction and timber to the standard models, so it seems logical that the overall sound might be different. Is there anyone out there who has been able to compare a standard model with an almost identical BFR model, and make an observation/comment on the sound? I really don't expect that there would be a noticable difference, but I'm very curious to know!
I warned you my question was dumb and ignorant!
Cheers and thanks
Apologies if this question is dumb, ignorant, or subjects you to my obsessive-compulsive drive to understand the universe in minute and useless detail…I’m just curious…
I’m saving up for my first ever EBMM…probably a Luke, though I’m considering a Petrucci as an alternative. I could probably order a standard model today, but those BFRs have me drooling. So my choice is: buy a standard model soon, or keep saving for another quarter-lifetime to get a BFR. (I am so jealous of you guys who have EBMM collections!!)
The problem for me is that EBMM guitars are extremely hard to find in stores around Melbourne (Australia), especially in the south-eastern/peninsular suburbs. Seems like no one stocks them. It’s hard enough to get hold of a standard Luke or Petrucci to try let alone a BFR model. So comparison is impossible for me, which leads me to my question…
Do the BFR models sound any different to the standard models? I mean, I'm far from an expert, but the construction of a guitar and the timber it is made from affect things like tone and sustain. The maple top on a BFR is (obviously) a different construction and timber to the standard models, so it seems logical that the overall sound might be different. Is there anyone out there who has been able to compare a standard model with an almost identical BFR model, and make an observation/comment on the sound? I really don't expect that there would be a noticable difference, but I'm very curious to know!
I warned you my question was dumb and ignorant!
Cheers and thanks