• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

StingRayzor

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
108
Position 4, high end rolled way back, mids up, a little extra bass. I am not sure how he EQ'ed later on, but I think he may have compressed it and maybe rolled back the mids a little.
 

Randracula

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Messages
2,485
Location
Fontana,CA,In The Valley Of The Dirt!
Position 4, high end rolled way back, mids up, a little extra bass. I am not sure how he EQ'ed later on, but I think he may have compressed it and maybe rolled back the mids a little.

Cool that's one of my favorite settings and I use pretty much the same EQ on position 2 as well. On position 3 I do the opposite and turn the highs almost all the up.....
 

Figjam

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
2,331
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
It's interesting how differently the positions are voiced, as we are pointing out ^ 1,2,and 4 are pretty trebely, but 3 especially needs some boosting in order to really have a presence.
 

Randracula

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Messages
2,485
Location
Fontana,CA,In The Valley Of The Dirt!
It's interesting how differently the positions are voiced, as we are pointing out ^ 1,2,and 4 are pretty trebely, but 3 especially needs some boosting in order to really have a presence.

True, although position 3 seems to have the biggest sound it needs a big boost in the high end compared to the other settings. #5 seems to be my least favorite settting but i'm sure i'll find a use for it eventually.....
 
Top Bottom