• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

JoeDogInKC

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Messages
207
If you're referring to the Speedloader system, I have a guitar on order from MF with one (The price was insanely cheap, $149 for a FR Discovery guitar with HSS configuration). Once it arrives (it's backordered apparently) I'll give a quick review of it. I went ahead and ordered some spare strings too because I guess they are relatively hard to find around town, etc.
 
Last edited:

GrooveHT

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Messages
218
If you're referring to the Speedloader system, I have a guitar on order from MF with one (The price was insanely cheap, $149 for a FR Discovery guitar with HSS configuration). Once it arrives (it's backordered apparently) I'll give a quick review of it. I went ahead and ordered some spare strings too because I guess they are relatively hard to find around town, etc.

actually this one that I linked to is a little different...it uses standard strings, I believe its like a standard floyd, rather than a speedloader, but the saddles accomodate ball ends, rather than snipped strings.
 

TonyEVH5150

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
1,558
Location
Nashville, TN
I think this is a spinoff from the Floyd Rose II system. If I'm not mistaken, it used a similar setup for ball-end strings. The strings actually fed through the trem side locking screws.

I don't think the Floyd is obsolete, but I do think that there have been trem systems like (MM's) that have made Floyds a little less of a necessity for tuning stability.

If they were obsolete, guitar builders wouldn't be using them.
 

Sub1 Zero

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
2,159
Location
Tulsa, OK
I say obsolete really because now there are things that are better. I think if more knew about the better systems, they'd die out pretty fast...
 

pjc812

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
420
Location
Evansville IN
I say obsolete really because now there are things that are better. I think if more knew about the better systems, they'd die out pretty fast...

+1. People ask for Floyds by name same as they ask for anything else by name. *shrug* MM certainly has a better system, the locking tuners and straight string pull make a locking nut unneccesary.
 

GrooveHT

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Messages
218
+1. People ask for Floyds by name same as they ask for anything else by name. *shrug* MM certainly has a better system, the locking tuners and straight string pull make a locking nut unneccesary.

I'm not sure that its not necessary for Vai-like whammy madness, but floyds aren't to my personal taste...I can see their use for sure though.
 

Sub1 Zero

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
2,159
Location
Tulsa, OK
I abuse my trems to death, and in practice my drummer even pointed it out "how does that thing stay in tune?"

MM's rule :cool:
 

Larry

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
3,687
Location
Iowa
The Lukes trem is as stable as any non locking trem I have ever used period. But still when you get caught in the dive bomb after dive bomb it can drop out a little. Thats why I want to find a Axis. I'll have it all covered :D Luke+Axis=tone heaven
 

gerry d

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
389
I like the tone of Floyds......:eek: real Floyds that is... I can't understand the problem some people seem to have with them... I have a Luke 2 with the EBMM non locking trem and yes it's great... but I also have had in the past guitars with Floyds that also had great tone.... I think they get a bad rap because of all the cheap copies that sounded crap and didn't work properly.... ORIGINAL Floyds in a good guitar can sound really great... and I'm not a divebomber... it's the tone Im talking about here...
 
Top Bottom