hmm that stinks, surprised i havent found more people talk about this. On my sterling , it adds a touch of quality, but i guess the one extra step less saves money.
Figman
Please just search big poppas from the members list posts and it is easily explained. I am biting my toungue when you accuse us of cost cutting many many years ago. If you read the post and still have an issue regarding the neck plate being recessed, than I offer sincere apologies.
P.S. which of your favorite bolt on's have a recessed neck plate?
\
nonono im not really accusing you of cutting costs if the reason is that it was a pain in the rear, i read in a different place that that was the initiative (it wasnt from an EBMM rep, it was a random guys opinion) so i guess i was seeing if that was truely the case.
I love the recessed neck plate as an owner but as a manufacturer it is a recipe for disaster. The issues involved are a little in the manufacturing and a lot in the field.
When laquer was legal we could finish a guitar with a very thin "build" as environmental regulations escalated the finishes got thicker making it harder to get the exact pocket. The other problem is in buffing....anytime you run up against a sharp corner ;you have a very high risk of buff through. We could live with that What we couldn't live with is the customer or tech that took the instrument apart and overtightening the neck causing finish cracks that would be blamed on us.
Thanks jon and big poppa, i intend on spending tomorrow out in the woods tomorow actually (i dont live in NYC, rather 1.5 hours north in the burbs) . Illprobably be picking blueberries to make into a pie.