Is it worth it?

[MM Scarborough]

this is my mentality about the sub and any other bass besides the other high dollar basses (lakland modulous rickenbacker gretsch)

I was looking at getting a bongo ealier on this year, however i opted for the sub, why? until i get signed i cant justify the sound and cost of a bongo, when a sub creates a good enough sound to help towards getting signed and when i spent the spare change on a van to do gigs all over the country!

 

[dlloyd]

That's it, except mine has a wenge neck.apart from that they are exactly the same.

Jazz pickups... you'll probably find the Stingray/SUB has a ballsier tone than your Warwick then, doesn't have that hollow sound.

 

[Nick2]

wow, the gc limited warwicks, i remember those....

when we were trying to sell them, no one would buy it, people wouldn't even try them. they didn't sound as good as the stock thumbs.

we eventually sold it to some guy for 400 dollars, so he could have a bass to leave at his church..


looked nice though.
joel D>

Well my warwick's certificate of authenticity doesn't say anything about the bass centre on it. And as for it not being as good as stock warwick, that makes me laugh.It murders stock warwicks.It was overlooked being made by Hans Peter Wilfer himeslf, and it was made by the best craftsmen warwick have.And its woods are top grade.It leaves your average warwick behind.

 

[Aussie Mark]

Surely Warwick have their own message board? This is getting very tired.

 

[basspastor]

I will say an "Amen" to that remark.

 

[Mobay45]

Let's make it our goal to find a Warwick board for Nick and send him there.

 

[Nick2]

Hey, I aint ruling out gettin' a SUB, but please, I was just saying my bass shouldn't be selling for $400. Mine rocks, must be summit wrong with the ones the guy had in his shop