• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

Matching headstocks yes-no?

  • Yes, matching headstock for me.

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • No, maple look for me.

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • Depends on body color.

    Votes: 11 44.0%
  • Could care less. I'll take either.

    Votes: 2 8.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .

phatduckk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
8,145
Location
San Mateo, California, United States
i really really dont like the matching headstocks .... there's an axis sport for sale on the guitar side and if it didnt have a matching headstock id buy it. i cant stand them ... but to each their own
 

midopa

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
3,850
Location
*
I got used to matching headstocks. It just comes down to how the bass looks overall for me.
 

SteveB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
6,192
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
For me, it depends on the color and config of the guitar. For example, I personally think a Petrucci 6 string in white looks great with a matching headstock, but I think I'd favor a natural headstock on the same guitar in black.

With basses, I think that the matching headstock looks good less often than with a guitar. I don't know why this is.. but in most configurations I like the basses better with natural headstocks. Actually, I'll refine this and say that with the basses, I think the Bongo looks good with a matching headstock more often than a Stingray or Sterling.

Lastly, I really dislike the black headstocks on the Limited Edition guitars and the SUB instruments.

Hey, you asked for our opinions, right? :D
 

Moondog

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2004
Messages
1,466
Location
Red Bank, NJ
I voted "No" for matching headstocks.
I don't like hiding the natural beauty of wood.
Don't ask me why I own a black & sparkle bass,
I prefer the natural & transparent finishes much more!
 

Mobay45

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
4,597
Location
Home of the Bongo Birthday Bash '06
I noticed that no one had chosen "I could care less". We are one opinionated bunch! Most of the time I don't like the matching headstock, but every once in a while I see a bass (Trans Gold SR5 w/RW fretboard and Tort P/G) that just totally changes my mind.
 

kilgore777

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
140
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
I really like the matching headstocks.

Having said that, my all time favorite finishes are all natural- I would kill for a 20th Anniversary Bass with quilted maple (the flame is beautious, too)- the finishes on the Anniversary models are my faves.

My fantasy EB bass would be a walnut quilt finish, or a sunburst quilt. Ahhhhh.... ;)

Edit: I said sunburst above- meant honeyburst. Sorry, my bad. :eek:
 
Last edited:

ebb soul

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
147
I really don't like matching headstocks, on balls, fenders or anything else.
I think it actually cheapens the look and is garrish.
 

Aragorn35016

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
742
Location
Arab, AL.
I voted yes though I dont currently own one with a matching headstock. I love blue or green basses with matching headstocks. It just owns me. :D :D
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,190
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
For me, it depends on the fingerboard.

Maple? No way. No way would I do a matching headstock with maple.

Rosewood? MAYBE. I had a black sparkle Ray with matching HS (rosewood board) and it looked great.

MMDaug3.jpg


See? Bass looks great. Bassist, not so great.
 

oddjob

Well-known member
Joined
May 12, 2004
Messages
2,839
Location
Monroe, Ohio
Had them all, matching stocks, colored body w/black stocks, natural body w/colored stocks, colored body w/natural stocks, all natural... and my fav... no stocks. I like the way basses look, but it has evolved way beyond that - it is more about how they play and sound. Yeah I lean towards natural stocks, but who cares, the Bongos look and play great (and I've got 2 matching and 1 non matching one to prove it. :cool: )
 
Top Bottom