• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

Meypelnek

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
156
Location
Munich, Germany
I'd like to share with you my comparisson of the three different StingRay 5 types: 3-Band with Ceramic PU and ALNICO PU, 2-Band Classic). All three basses have a maple fretboard, ash body and are equipped with Ernie Ball Cobalt Slinkys. Happy for some thumbs up or a comment.


Clipboard01.jpg
 
Last edited:

Meypelnek

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
156
Location
Munich, Germany
Yes, me too. I was surprised to find out that the Ceramic 3-Band is so close to the ALNICO 2-Band.
Perhaps that is the reason it was changed back in '92 from in the SR5 from ALNICO to Ceramic?
 

wikifishy

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
21
Anyway , dont forget the pickup and preamps are part of the tone but not the whole thing.Each bass has its own voice because every piece of wood is different.Play the basses unpluged at the bathroom, ideally with the same strings, then you will know
 

Paco Maraca

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
39
Location
Germany
Thanks for sharing. Ranking is not really easy and depends on personal taste. For fingerstyle I like the ceramic PU most. On slapping the classic 2-band rules, this is the sound I immediately associate with a Stingray. And the pick comes best with the aggresive sound of the 3-band Alnico.

Gesendet von meinem SGP511 mit Tapatalk
 

sanderhermans

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
1,091
Location
belgium
Tough choice between the ceramic 3 band and the classic ray5.
The classic ray is for me the overall winner, but the ceramic sounds best for rock music. I personally dont really like the sound of the 3band alnico. I think the 3 band needs some tweeking when used with a alnico pickup.

Both my 2 band rays sound great with flat eq, as does my sterling. But the 3 band eq is a bit harsh for my taste in conjuction with alnico pickups.
 

rogerbmiller

Active member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
37
Yes, me too. I was surprised to find out that the Ceramic 3-Band is so close to the ALNICO 2-Band.
Perhaps that is the reason it was changed back in '92 from in the SR5 from ALNICO to Ceramic?


Agreed. I preferred those tones a bit as compared to the 3 band Alnico. And I liked that one too but the others had a little more fullness to them.

Very cool "shootout." Thanks for sharing.
 

Kong

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
79
Location
Germany, Baden-Württemberg. South Germany, near to
We sure do need a "like" - button on this forum. ;)

I am with you. As I have an AlNiCo Ray 4 with a 3 - Bd - Preamp to compare with my Ray 5 Classic and my Ray 5 3 - Bd - Pre I find the AlNiCo three banger more agressive. Hard to say, which of the two Ray 5's is my favourite, as they have their place in different bands.
 

Mu5icM@n

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2007
Messages
175
Location
Northern VA
You can send me the alnico bass since it obviously sounds too terrible. I'll find something to do with it!

I actually prefer the alnico PU. I was surprised how much of a difference there was.

Tom
 
Top Bottom