pauldogx
Well-known member
Ok-folks, I've had my Luke and my Silo for a couple a weeks now. My question is--why does the Luke feel so small at the nut----I wrote down all the neck dimensions from the site and compared---the Silo has the same nut width and the luke is only slightly thinner at the last fret. Is it perhaps in my head because I've heard so many people say the Luke neck is "small"---or is it perhaps the V profile of the Luke that gives this impression. The Silo feels fine to me as did a rosewood axis I tried----but Pete D's AL seemed a bit cramped to me at the nut as well. Tommy's morse felt pretty much like my silo. So what gives? I must admit that after looking at the dimensions on paper--- the Luke felt better to me---so part of it is probably a predisposed bias(in my head). My Str** by comparison, is only 2mm wider at the nut yet it feels way bigger. I can't believe 2mm would make that much of a difference----but this is also comin from a guy who has long giant fingers and I love the wide flatter radius Ib**** necks, but feels most at home on the dimensions of the American Standard str**. Looks like I'm gonna have to try out a Petrucci----seems those neck specs are right up my alley. All this aside----I love my Silo and will never part with it, the Luke I'm still not totally comfortable with it. If I could afford it--I'd keep it without question---Lukes my all time fav---just not sure its the right plank for me.