Father Gino
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 19, 2005
- Messages
- 219
But I have to ask anyway.
I have personal experience with only 3 MM basses. Sterling, SR5 & pre EB Sabre. The Sterling & SR5 sound very similar. I think the SR5 is a bit beefier and the Sterling a little clearer, but I've heard recordings of me playing both and I can barely tell the difference. The Sabre is different. In the same family, especially with the bridge PU soloed, but noticably different. It's not as clean & clear. Higher highs, mushier lows, no mids.
So do I know what a Stingray is? Does an SR4 sound pretty much like a Sterling/SR5 or more like the Sabre?
Does an pre EB Sabre (with just the bridge PU) sound pretty much like a pre EB Stingray?
Is there a big difference tone wise between pre & post EB Stingrays?
I have the feeling that my Sabre does sound more like a pre EB Stingray. If so, I think I like the post EB sound better.
I still wish they had an active/passive switch though.
I have personal experience with only 3 MM basses. Sterling, SR5 & pre EB Sabre. The Sterling & SR5 sound very similar. I think the SR5 is a bit beefier and the Sterling a little clearer, but I've heard recordings of me playing both and I can barely tell the difference. The Sabre is different. In the same family, especially with the bridge PU soloed, but noticably different. It's not as clean & clear. Higher highs, mushier lows, no mids.
So do I know what a Stingray is? Does an SR4 sound pretty much like a Sterling/SR5 or more like the Sabre?
Does an pre EB Sabre (with just the bridge PU) sound pretty much like a pre EB Stingray?
Is there a big difference tone wise between pre & post EB Stingrays?
I have the feeling that my Sabre does sound more like a pre EB Stingray. If so, I think I like the post EB sound better.
I still wish they had an active/passive switch though.