boristhespider7
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 113
Love ya...own Sterlings and Stingrays...etc.
But, for the love the low end gods, please, please, please have Musician's Friend correct its description of the Sterling 4 (H and HH) on its web site and in its catalogs!!! For many years now, it has described the Sterling's neck as "basically the same" as the Stingray because it is the same scale and radius. The Sterling and Stingray do not have "basically the same" neck for many reasons (width, depth, contoured neck heel, additional fret on Sterling, etc.). It's one of the key differences between the models.
(As a footnote, even the Stingray Slo Special does not have a "Sterling neck" as it lacks the extra fret of a Sterling and the neck depth at frets 1 and 12 is slightly thicker than an actual Sterling neck..but I digress.)
Maybe as a MM devotee, I'm sensitive, but this makes me cringe every time I read it. It's been this way for years, and quite frankly, I can't believe you haven't corrected them by now regarding this innaccurate description. Even a number of the reviewers on MF's web site have mentioned this issue.
Again, love ya...but I had to get this off my chest.
But, for the love the low end gods, please, please, please have Musician's Friend correct its description of the Sterling 4 (H and HH) on its web site and in its catalogs!!! For many years now, it has described the Sterling's neck as "basically the same" as the Stingray because it is the same scale and radius. The Sterling and Stingray do not have "basically the same" neck for many reasons (width, depth, contoured neck heel, additional fret on Sterling, etc.). It's one of the key differences between the models.
(As a footnote, even the Stingray Slo Special does not have a "Sterling neck" as it lacks the extra fret of a Sterling and the neck depth at frets 1 and 12 is slightly thicker than an actual Sterling neck..but I digress.)
Maybe as a MM devotee, I'm sensitive, but this makes me cringe every time I read it. It's been this way for years, and quite frankly, I can't believe you haven't corrected them by now regarding this innaccurate description. Even a number of the reviewers on MF's web site have mentioned this issue.
Again, love ya...but I had to get this off my chest.