Wasn't sure if EB's legal dpt. had seen this yet, but it was and is my understanding that the 4+2 tuner orientation was a registered trademark. Someone shoudl let these fellows know. Welcome to Hanson Guitars!
Hey guys, I am an intellectual property lawyer, a registered patent attorney to be exact. I am not associated with EBMM in any way so I will not opine on the issues raised here.
However, I have seen comments from threads like this used in legal proceedings before. I have had to deal with comment threads in patent cases, so I feel compelled to make one small point.
The comments here by EBMM's customers here could be found relevant in a trade mark/trade dress proceeding, and a seemingly harmless bit of speculation by a forum member regarding what a particular poster deemed protectable/not protectable/silly etc. could come back to haunt EBMM at some point, and cost BP lots of $$$ to have his attorneys explain it in court someday."
Accordingly, I would encourage forum members to refrain from random lay speculation on legal matters, and leave the enforcement efforts to EBMM's esteemed counsel.
nothing stops them from licensing the 2+4, if EBMM were so inclined. i bet caparison pays for it. like alot of ppl pay for FR licenses, and alot more for the humbucker licenses.