B2D
Well-known member
My main amp is a Bogner Ecstasy 101b - those of you familiar with this amp know what the business is on it... very powerful, three great channels, tons of flexibility.
Yet I find myself being somewhat disillusioned by it lately.
As good as it sounds, there's a couple things about it that don't sit quite well with me. I've never been able to get the midrange to sound completely right to me. I'm told that upper-mids thing is just something that amp does and it's characteristic of the sound of that amp. I can't really dial it out, but I live with it.
Plus, for all the options on this amp - gain boosts, parallel effects loop, Plexi mode, three channels, damping switches, treble range switches... etc. I never really use them. I just set 'em and forget 'em. And I feel somewhat bad about not using the amp to it's maximum potential.
This is NOT a complaint about the amp at all - it's just my relationship with it and the sound it has. And it leaves 95% of all tube heads out there in the dust. The other 5% is just personal preference. Its the closest thing I had heard to the sound in my head.
Enter that other 5% - The Naked Amp by Dave Friedman.
I stopped in to a local boutique hop to talk tone with the owner (Tone Merchants - Rob Navarette, great guy btw) and discussed my issues with the Bogner with him. After listening to me, he led me over to this amp that basically looked like a new JMP, or a modded Marshall type. I wouldn't have looked at it otherwise, but when i plugged into this amp it absolutely floored me. I couldn't believe the sound out of this thing. Fat, smooth, dark, defined overdrive, and crystalline cleans in a simple, straightforward, no nonsense package. It was my main sound out of the Bogner but a little less compressed and more percussive, with a more even, smoother midrange that was a delight to play. The great thing about it was that it didn't fatigue your ears too fast like some Marshalls do, and it even sounded great at levels that would normally stop the soundman from complaining but leave you disappointed!
Bottom line that amp has haunted me since I played it, and that was two months ago.
I just got a Mesa/Boogie Tremoverb as a backup head and it sounds fantastic in it's own right, but for that hopped-up Marshall based sound I love, the Naked really hit the spot. I'm all but certain that I'm going to sell my Bogner and get a JMP modded to Naked specs (which Dave said he will do, as it's much cheaper than buying a new Naked). I just need to wait for the shop's Naked to come back in (it's currently at Premier Guitar's offices) and give it another test run before I make up my mind, as I want to be absolutely, 100% sure.
is it bad that I'm very seriously considering parting with one of the best tube heads of all time for something much simpler? I suppose not if it's an improvement and more satisfying.
I've been told I'll miss the versatility of the Bogner - but I was in a full-time cover band with a Carvin Legacy before (2-ch head) and coupled up with an overdrive pedal and working my guitar right I got all the sounds I needed for covers. I think versatility is in the player first before it's in the gear. If I really needed that kind of versatility for session gigs or something I'd probably just get an Axe-FX.
I suppose I'm just sounding off on you guys to make sure I'm of sound mind and judgement here.
Yet I find myself being somewhat disillusioned by it lately.
As good as it sounds, there's a couple things about it that don't sit quite well with me. I've never been able to get the midrange to sound completely right to me. I'm told that upper-mids thing is just something that amp does and it's characteristic of the sound of that amp. I can't really dial it out, but I live with it.
Plus, for all the options on this amp - gain boosts, parallel effects loop, Plexi mode, three channels, damping switches, treble range switches... etc. I never really use them. I just set 'em and forget 'em. And I feel somewhat bad about not using the amp to it's maximum potential.
This is NOT a complaint about the amp at all - it's just my relationship with it and the sound it has. And it leaves 95% of all tube heads out there in the dust. The other 5% is just personal preference. Its the closest thing I had heard to the sound in my head.
Enter that other 5% - The Naked Amp by Dave Friedman.
I stopped in to a local boutique hop to talk tone with the owner (Tone Merchants - Rob Navarette, great guy btw) and discussed my issues with the Bogner with him. After listening to me, he led me over to this amp that basically looked like a new JMP, or a modded Marshall type. I wouldn't have looked at it otherwise, but when i plugged into this amp it absolutely floored me. I couldn't believe the sound out of this thing. Fat, smooth, dark, defined overdrive, and crystalline cleans in a simple, straightforward, no nonsense package. It was my main sound out of the Bogner but a little less compressed and more percussive, with a more even, smoother midrange that was a delight to play. The great thing about it was that it didn't fatigue your ears too fast like some Marshalls do, and it even sounded great at levels that would normally stop the soundman from complaining but leave you disappointed!
Bottom line that amp has haunted me since I played it, and that was two months ago.
I just got a Mesa/Boogie Tremoverb as a backup head and it sounds fantastic in it's own right, but for that hopped-up Marshall based sound I love, the Naked really hit the spot. I'm all but certain that I'm going to sell my Bogner and get a JMP modded to Naked specs (which Dave said he will do, as it's much cheaper than buying a new Naked). I just need to wait for the shop's Naked to come back in (it's currently at Premier Guitar's offices) and give it another test run before I make up my mind, as I want to be absolutely, 100% sure.
is it bad that I'm very seriously considering parting with one of the best tube heads of all time for something much simpler? I suppose not if it's an improvement and more satisfying.
I've been told I'll miss the versatility of the Bogner - but I was in a full-time cover band with a Carvin Legacy before (2-ch head) and coupled up with an overdrive pedal and working my guitar right I got all the sounds I needed for covers. I think versatility is in the player first before it's in the gear. If I really needed that kind of versatility for session gigs or something I'd probably just get an Axe-FX.
I suppose I'm just sounding off on you guys to make sure I'm of sound mind and judgement here.