Microbaroms
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 36
b
Consider this.
There are no two ways about it.
Either 'The Fish Monarchist' was Genuine or he was indeed, as so many determined right from the very start, a Troll.
Each of us will decide for ourselves.
At times I am invited to talk for an hour, giving a question and answer session afterward, at The Officers Training Corp based at the University, and in addition get to visit Troops and Airmen in various Bases and Camps.
Thus am well acquainted with and can easily recognise for what they are the tactical ploys and games such people employ. These include, Time Winning, Stalling Tactics, International Diplomacy, Political Interference, and Drawing Support from other Seats of Power.
My view was clearly that he was a Troll.
And I would like to present the formal basis for my believing that, a case based upon the best evidence available.
But to anyone that entertained the notion that I would have a natural bias, against him having so utterly ragged 'The Fish Monarchist', and been subjected to his continual abuse.
I would strongly point out the undeniable mitigating fact, that the only material substance I ever used to 'rag him' with, were his very own words.
The words he himself alone had written.
This surely must be completely acceptable, and the most completely reasonable of approaches.
I point this out, because I will largely base my evidence, utilising an Analysis of his very own words and the points he himself raised.
Using his own words and points against him is a powerful and compelling manner to entrap someone. It's very difficult indeed, to be able to escape from the intense rigours of such a closely scrutinised legalistic approach.
Consider this.
There are no two ways about it.
Either 'The Fish Monarchist' was Genuine or he was indeed, as so many determined right from the very start, a Troll.
Each of us will decide for ourselves.
At times I am invited to talk for an hour, giving a question and answer session afterward, at The Officers Training Corp based at the University, and in addition get to visit Troops and Airmen in various Bases and Camps.
Thus am well acquainted with and can easily recognise for what they are the tactical ploys and games such people employ. These include, Time Winning, Stalling Tactics, International Diplomacy, Political Interference, and Drawing Support from other Seats of Power.
My view was clearly that he was a Troll.
And I would like to present the formal basis for my believing that, a case based upon the best evidence available.
But to anyone that entertained the notion that I would have a natural bias, against him having so utterly ragged 'The Fish Monarchist', and been subjected to his continual abuse.
I would strongly point out the undeniable mitigating fact, that the only material substance I ever used to 'rag him' with, were his very own words.
The words he himself alone had written.
This surely must be completely acceptable, and the most completely reasonable of approaches.
I point this out, because I will largely base my evidence, utilising an Analysis of his very own words and the points he himself raised.
Using his own words and points against him is a powerful and compelling manner to entrap someone. It's very difficult indeed, to be able to escape from the intense rigours of such a closely scrutinised legalistic approach.