• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

kylierider

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
394
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
What is the tension like on the Ernie ball group II flats compaired to the Steve Harris flats. I'm looking for something lighter than the Harris flats but not as light as the TI's. Would the II's fall in the catagory or should I consider something else?

Also do the ball flats have the silk windings on them?
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,200
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
Blue silks. As to how they compare to Steve Harris flats, I have no earthly idea, never having used the SH's.

They have more tension than the TIs, though, that much is for sure, but not as much as those Fenders (9050s?). They remind me, tension-wise, of the Chromes.

Good flats, those Group IIs are.
 

pbass2go

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
76
Location
Bloomington MN
Never used the Steve Harris Sig strings either, but I have Chromes on my P-bass, Fender Flats on my Stingray(changing to Chromes this weekend) and am putting Group II flats on my Bongo this weekend also.

I like the Chromes alot, not crazy about the Fenders, and am looing fwd to the Group II's.

Cheers...
 

Aussie Mark

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
5,646
Location
Sydney, Australia
ANY flatwounds on the market and most railway lines are lower tension than the Roto Steve Harris set. From highest tension to lowest tension flats, this is how I'd rank them -

Roto
Fender
Dean Markley
Chromes / EB
La Bella
TI
 
Top Bottom