Ian Perge
Active member
As a potential Bongo 5 buyer, I must say that the new "Y-shape" tuners (that's how pretty much any Gotoh/Hipshot/etc newer-design shape is called) increase my desire for one a large amount... and that's simply going on visuals (as I stated, IMO such a forward-looking design calls for the same in *every* department) and not performance or weight - being a lightweight tuners is for me a bonus and a welcome one as a Disabled Player who also had major Back Surgery @ 21 and who must take weight into account when purchasing a bass.
As for "Standard vs Aftermarket" status, I'd be happy with either one. If I choose to purchase a new Bongo I (as well as my wallet) would be grateful for them to be standard tuners and not have to purchase replacements just to install first-thing after delivery along with my usual practice of StrapLoks & New Strings (although with the "Parted-Out Basses" increasing hand-over-fist on online auction sites, I'm sure I could make my money back in the sale of "Official Music Man Tuners!) However, if I'm able to fulfill my dream of one day finding a Dargie Delight II 5-string for sale the availability of them as Aftermarket Tuners would mean I could keep the bass "stock". And it's not like I haven't changed out parts in the past - at this point in my life/playing "career", I purchase for me[/b] and not as an investment likely to be sold in the future. I'd simply rather not drill new screw holes if possible. ;-)
While I understand EBMM's decision on some of the issues that have come up in this thread, I think an "Apples to Apples" approach is more worthy of discussion. AFAIK at a large majority of other bass builders at the pricepoint of SLO-built instruments, hardware color is typically the customer's choice & not really a big deal in the scheme of things. I think my past points regarding Black Hardware as an option are logical and well thought out (toss Gold in as well, having been used on the 2008 "Sequoia Gold" LE - I'm only talking about hardware that has been produced and used by Music Man for Limited Edition lines and not one-offs in the past) and would only increase sales for a limited outlay... even make a profit it it's an Upcharge for taking such build into an alternate production cycle. And I know by personal observation that my guitar friends on their boards would love the choice of Black Hardware vs Chrome, especially as it's already been used on both the Stealth & JPX models.
...but to go along with your analogy, I simply don't see this as a "one from column A, two from column B" call, nor a "Corvette steering wheel on a Chevy Pickup". It's far more akin to an car's Options Package that a) you *still* can't eliminate specific choices from that; it's either the whole package or none, and b) *is* an upcharge that the company makes a profit on. And ultimately, I'd rather have Sterling & The Company gain the cost of my purchasing/installing Alternate Hardware than an aftermarket company.
As for "Standard vs Aftermarket" status, I'd be happy with either one. If I choose to purchase a new Bongo I (as well as my wallet) would be grateful for them to be standard tuners and not have to purchase replacements just to install first-thing after delivery along with my usual practice of StrapLoks & New Strings (although with the "Parted-Out Basses" increasing hand-over-fist on online auction sites, I'm sure I could make my money back in the sale of "Official Music Man Tuners!) However, if I'm able to fulfill my dream of one day finding a Dargie Delight II 5-string for sale the availability of them as Aftermarket Tuners would mean I could keep the bass "stock". And it's not like I haven't changed out parts in the past - at this point in my life/playing "career", I purchase for me[/b] and not as an investment likely to be sold in the future. I'd simply rather not drill new screw holes if possible. ;-)
Of course, this may have changed... but those of you who have been around awhile should be well aware that EBMM doesn't do the "one from column A, two from column B" thing with its instruments.
You can't get alternate bits on your new bass, any more than you'd be able to get Chevrolet to build you pickup truck with a Corvette steering wheel just because you think it'd be cool.
While I understand EBMM's decision on some of the issues that have come up in this thread, I think an "Apples to Apples" approach is more worthy of discussion. AFAIK at a large majority of other bass builders at the pricepoint of SLO-built instruments, hardware color is typically the customer's choice & not really a big deal in the scheme of things. I think my past points regarding Black Hardware as an option are logical and well thought out (toss Gold in as well, having been used on the 2008 "Sequoia Gold" LE - I'm only talking about hardware that has been produced and used by Music Man for Limited Edition lines and not one-offs in the past) and would only increase sales for a limited outlay... even make a profit it it's an Upcharge for taking such build into an alternate production cycle. And I know by personal observation that my guitar friends on their boards would love the choice of Black Hardware vs Chrome, especially as it's already been used on both the Stealth & JPX models.
...but to go along with your analogy, I simply don't see this as a "one from column A, two from column B" call, nor a "Corvette steering wheel on a Chevy Pickup". It's far more akin to an car's Options Package that a) you *still* can't eliminate specific choices from that; it's either the whole package or none, and b) *is* an upcharge that the company makes a profit on. And ultimately, I'd rather have Sterling & The Company gain the cost of my purchasing/installing Alternate Hardware than an aftermarket company.