• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

TheBassGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
498
Location
The Netherlands
Finally I've sold my Axis Super Sport and now I can focus on getting a proper bass again. Yesterday I was in a local store and discovered G&L basses. I plugged one in and started jamming. I was/am amazed at the possibilities of the dual humbucking setup. Without sounding too modern, these basses can give a wide range of tones. The big thing for me, is that these basses are both passive and active. :)

Now, I was wondering. An EBMM bass that can go passive and active, has 2 humbuckers, but preserves the classic tones. Does it exist? The Sterling that I had was/is a great instrument, with options approaching the G&L, but lacks the passive mode. The 25th and the Big-AL have these possibilities, but do they go both series and parallel? The bummer about these 2 instruments is that there not very good available here, and if one can be found, they charge the price of at least 2 stingrays.. ;)

So, that left me with 1 option. A 2eq stingray with dual humbuckings. The 2eq gives the passive mode (right?), and the 2 humbuckers give about the same pallet as the G&L. Does a 2 humbucker Ray also give the series/parallel option?

I'm a little confused right now. I have found something that comes really close to Musicman perfection, but I don't want to leave my favorite brand.. :confused:
 

Manfloozy

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,047
Location
Naples, FL
Your best bet is waiting just a very little bit longer and picking up a Reflex HH when it comes out (probably next month).

The Reflex is the production model (which means less expensive) version of the 25th. It can do active/passive and series/parralel. Plus it has a 4 band eq and a lot more option then those too. Search YouTube for Ed Friedlands review of the 25th or go to theperfectbass.com and check out Brandts review of the HH, or both. That should give you a taste of the range it has.
 

oli@bass

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
4,272
Location
Switzerland
StingRay: No passive mode at all
Dual pickup StingRay: No 2EQ available

That said, I really don't see that much use for a passive mode and a plethora of different sounds especially in a live band situation. Too many options are just distracting.

And to learn how to get different tones from your bass without twising any controls is much more important (and useful), than to have all those options. Frankly, I'd not consider a 25th as a beginners bass.

@Manfloozy: Yes, probably, BUT... we don't know what controls it will really have, and it will most certainly still cost twice as much as a StingRay (just FYI, the Big Al costs almost 4000 USD in Switzerland), and it will have a wait time for about 8 months.
 

Duarte

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
2,023
Location
Birmingham, UK
I would say it's not about the options available, but the actual usable tones you can get out of an instrument.

For example, I found that the L2000 had very few actual usable sounds in there - despite all the options. Get a HH StingRay - forget about passive mode or series and parallel, and just get great sounds. And I wouldn't say an HH StingRay is quite as 'versatile' (using that word in the context of options you COULD use if you wanted) but I would say it sounds a lot better.
 

Manfloozy

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,047
Location
Naples, FL
Duarte and Oli are spot on too...just because you have options that doesn't make them usable. People SWEAR by single pickup 2eqs... Why because they do what they do so well. Options aren't always a good thing. Any EBMM will have a great voice or two.
 

five7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
4,295
I would say it's not about the options available, but the actual usable tones you can get out of an instrument.

For example, I found that the L2000 had very few actual usable sounds in there - despite all the options. Get a HH StingRay - forget about passive mode or series and parallel, and just get great sounds. And I wouldn't say an HH StingRay is quite as 'versatile' (using that word in the context of options you COULD use if you wanted) but I would say it sounds a lot better.

Useable is the key. I have owned several g and l basses and did not like the tone. They are gone and my single pickup stingrays stay. A MM bass feels like quality. The g and l feels like tinker toys.
 

the unrepentant

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
1,191
Location
Bangor, UK
i had an L2k tribby - i know, not the same as a USA, but same pickups and same preamp circuit i think, anyways, i had that at the same time as my single pickup 2 band SUB, i sold the L2k because quite simply, the musicman sounded better.
 

Aussie Mark

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
5,646
Location
Sydney, Australia
I've owned two L2000s, and found some of the settings unusable in a live situation. They are very well made instruments and the necks are almost as nice as EBMMs, but I could never tame the treble and brightness of the pickups - to me, some of the L2000 tones grate like chalk on a blackboard.
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,190
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
Beautiful G&L there, and I had a few G&L's WAAAY back when....only complaint I had at the time was the shielding.....pretty noisy. Maybe they have that taken care of.

But let's try to keep this pointed in the right direction, if we could? And remember this is the EBMM forum.

Thanks for making my moderator job easy.

Jack
 

Grand Wazoo

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
2,830
Location
Planet Remulak :)
My obvious question here is... if the headstock layout 3+1 and 4+1 are a registered intellectual trademark of Ernie Ball MusicMan instruments, so how can G&L get away with it?
 

maddog

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
4,463
Location
Albuquerque
My obvious question here is... if the headstock layout 3+1 and 4+1 are a registered intellectual trademark of Ernie Ball MusicMan instruments, so how can G&L get away with it?

4+1 is trademarked by EBMM?

G&L uses a 3+1?

when did this happen?

:confused:
 
Last edited:

maddog

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
4,463
Location
Albuquerque
well, to answer your original question, they can get away with it because:

a.) there designs don't involve a 3+1

and

b.) 4+1 is not trademarked by EBMM.
 

Kirby

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
1,156
Location
Indiana
I briefly owned a trans red L2000 and liked it for the time I had it. To me it was redundant of my Stingrays which I liked better so it moved on. The main reason I purchased it to begin with was just to help out a friend. Before I owned my first Stingray 5, I tried the original 5 string version of the L2000, I found the B to be way too floppy despite being strung throught the body so I have never owned one of those to be able to comment.
 

Caca de Kick

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
1,363
Location
South Seattle
I have active basses, and I have passive basses. But there is never anytime I want my active basses to be passive.

But having owned same models of the basses in question...
The pickup placements will keep them from sounding like each other. The L2000 and SR4HH pickups are located in vastly different spots.
If you want a 2 band HH, then the Sabre was the only one that did it. But still, even though Leo seemed to have used the Sabre as a huge influence for the L2000, the pickup locations and the magnet material, just are two completely different sounding basses.

Grand Wazoo, you're getting confused by looking at that first year 5 string with the 4+1. That headstock design didn't last very long and quickly got changed to the 3+2.
 

TheBassGuy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
498
Location
The Netherlands
interesting answers. :) I have to agree that despite having all the options, not all the sounds I could get were amazing. I have a really hard time deciding what to do since I don't have a MM bas to reference from running trough the same amp.

To my ears, I could get a Sterling tone from the L2000, and something that came near a Ray, but not quite. Also a lot of different, non MM tones that are quite usable.

I'm gravitating towards 3 basses at the moment. Either a G&L L1500/L2000/ASAT, a Stingray or a Bongo. If it's gonna be a Ray, I'd rather prefer single humbucker on second thought since I actually believe that dual pickup Ray's is like ruining a classic iconic bass (yes its silly, but I love classics and nostalgics). A Bongo still speaks to my imagination, but I just can't get over the looks. Argh, I hate choices! (But I also hate my plywood bass, so I want to make a move quick ;) )
 
Top Bottom