• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

jlepre

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
3,020
Location
Parsippany, NJ, United States
I need to replace the nut on a recently acquired 1998 SR5. I was wondering if a compensated nut can be retrofitted? I would be willing to ship the bass back to slow if needed.

My other option would be just to let my local luthier replace with a standard nut.

Any thoughts?
 

Redblade

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
53
Location
Iowa
I could be wrong but I think this is highly unlikely. I don't think Musicman would provide something like this for a retrofit.
 

jlepre

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
3,020
Location
Parsippany, NJ, United States
Thanks guys for your opinions. I kind of feel the same way, but I'm hoping someone in the know will shed some light. If not I'm going to call Customer Service tomorrow.
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,197
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
Not really. You'd have to shave (read: chisel) a bunch of wood out of the neck/headstock.

Definitely not worth it (and SLO won't do it, if I recall correctly).
 

Redblade

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
53
Location
Iowa
You know, this is probably a really could thing they don't sell these for retrofit. Could you imagine the hoards of chuckleheads defiling perfectly good MM instruments attempting it?
 

cellkirk74

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
1,345
Location
Germany near Frankfurt
I had some standard nuts glued by the local bass tech. Even installing a new bone nut is not rocket sience to a good luthier and is not that expensive...
 

jlepre

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
3,020
Location
Parsippany, NJ, United States
Could I send the bass to Slo, and have them do the work? I would pay for the job. If this isn't an option, then I will have a regular nut installed locally. Sorry if I'm not getting the message.
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,197
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
As I said, SLO won't do it. If you (or anyone) chisels out wood near the fretboard/headstock interface, which isn't exactly the thickest part of any bass, you're just asking for structural issues.

I'd go with a regular nut.
 

J Romano

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
878
Location
Rochester, NY
I posted in the other thread you started on pickup height, I post here too. I talked to the tech at GC in Rochester. He told me that a nut replacement was $35. He also said that he would do a custom nut, as opposed to a replacement part, even in bone. It was more expensive. I talked to EB CS and a replacement nut was available thru them. You should go for an exact replacement for what was there!
 

Golem

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
2,283
Location
My Place
My 2004 fretless Bongo did not.
My 2010 fretless Big Al did.

Huh. Maybe the use of std nuts for FL basses
was only intended to finish off the existing
supply of std nuts. There's no solid reason to
have a comp'd nut on an FL ... but since it's a
molded item, it's prolly cheaper to use them
for both FL and bumpy, compared to keeping
a more varied parts inventory. I mean, even if
it doesn't do anything for an FL, it doesn't do
any harm neither.

OTOH, when fine tuning [FILE tuning] my own
FL's, I'd rather have the simpler, plain nut .....
especially if I file too far and so hafta replace it.
 
Last edited:

Freddels

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Near Wistah
I would think a different height for each would be appropriate. If they have a compensated nut for fretless that is lower than the ones for fretted it would provide exact uniformity in their product.
 
Top Bottom