Hi everyone!
I have a recent Stingray 5, and have read the advice online about keeping the finish up on the back of neck. I bought the Tru-Oil and gunstock wax as EB recommends, and have applied it a couple of times. Feels good, but doesn't seem as durable to me as the more common hard lacquer. Also, the bass seems to need tuning adjustments more often than I am used to (although it's possible this is my imagination).
Has anyone out there ever decided they just didn't want to think about this neck finish issue any more, and had a luthier put a hard lacquer finish on the back of the neck? I was wondering if it makes any difference in tuning stability, or how often the neck needs adjustment.
I like the feel of the oil finish OK, but I think I would be just as happy with a hard satin finish, as on the headstock and neck heel.
Is there any reason (other than possibly affecting resale value) that this would be a dumb thing to do?
Thanks!
Bill
I have a recent Stingray 5, and have read the advice online about keeping the finish up on the back of neck. I bought the Tru-Oil and gunstock wax as EB recommends, and have applied it a couple of times. Feels good, but doesn't seem as durable to me as the more common hard lacquer. Also, the bass seems to need tuning adjustments more often than I am used to (although it's possible this is my imagination).
Has anyone out there ever decided they just didn't want to think about this neck finish issue any more, and had a luthier put a hard lacquer finish on the back of the neck? I was wondering if it makes any difference in tuning stability, or how often the neck needs adjustment.
I like the feel of the oil finish OK, but I think I would be just as happy with a hard satin finish, as on the headstock and neck heel.
Is there any reason (other than possibly affecting resale value) that this would be a dumb thing to do?
Thanks!
Bill