straycat113
Well-known member
So many artist I grew up on used Les Pauls and so much great music was made with them, but also it was really a two company guitar market back then and I played for the other team. I have never owned a Gibson though I have borrowed them from friends for months on end.
Both Fender and Gibson hit the nail on the head very early on and those guitars and tones are still out there but neither company has had any luck with newer models in 50 to 40 years. Gibson could thank Slash for raising the Les Paul from the dead as before G&R broke no young bands were playing them and though they have tried to at least attempt something different, the last 7 new models look like they were made by some old Grateful Dead fan.
There is no denying the greatness of a Les Paul and the reason Gibson can charge those insane prices is the majority of guys who play them are 40 and up and are more than likely financially set and since that is what they played in there younger days and also there idols, that is what they are going to go for.
But as far as being creative and pushing on out into the future EBMM would be at the top of my list, the craftsmanship, playability,tone and color schemes are just off the chart.And believe me I am a hard guy to impress and dont blow smoke up anyone's a## I say what I feel to be the truth. My good friend,tech and owner of the Guitar store I hang in just bought a Luke ,Silo and now a Sub within the last 2 months and he owns about 60 guitars but got bit by the music man bug from working on my guitars and I dont even own one of those models.lol But every time I stroll in he has the Luke right by him.
I really cant understand why Gibson is having so many problems with quality control as you can pick up any magazine or go to any forum and all you here is problems with them right out of the box that you would think by now heads would roll and someone would be on top of the problem, and after so long it is hard to shake that image as it stays with you.
Both Fender and Gibson hit the nail on the head very early on and those guitars and tones are still out there but neither company has had any luck with newer models in 50 to 40 years. Gibson could thank Slash for raising the Les Paul from the dead as before G&R broke no young bands were playing them and though they have tried to at least attempt something different, the last 7 new models look like they were made by some old Grateful Dead fan.
There is no denying the greatness of a Les Paul and the reason Gibson can charge those insane prices is the majority of guys who play them are 40 and up and are more than likely financially set and since that is what they played in there younger days and also there idols, that is what they are going to go for.
But as far as being creative and pushing on out into the future EBMM would be at the top of my list, the craftsmanship, playability,tone and color schemes are just off the chart.And believe me I am a hard guy to impress and dont blow smoke up anyone's a## I say what I feel to be the truth. My good friend,tech and owner of the Guitar store I hang in just bought a Luke ,Silo and now a Sub within the last 2 months and he owns about 60 guitars but got bit by the music man bug from working on my guitars and I dont even own one of those models.lol But every time I stroll in he has the Luke right by him.
I really cant understand why Gibson is having so many problems with quality control as you can pick up any magazine or go to any forum and all you here is problems with them right out of the box that you would think by now heads would roll and someone would be on top of the problem, and after so long it is hard to shake that image as it stays with you.