• Security notice: Ernie Ball staff will never send you a direct message about a prize or giveaway, and will never ask you to click a link to "claim" anything.
    If you receive a message like that - even from an account whose name looks official - do not click the link. Please report it using the Report link on the message so the moderators can act. A scam campaign impersonating admin accounts was blocked on 29 July 2026; those accounts are banned and their messages have been deleted.

Luke 3 vs Luke 3 BFR

LewisW

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
54
Hey guys - I played a luke 3 BFR HH on the weekend for the first time and as you expect loved everything about it ... One thing I was surprised by was the weight of it, does anyone have experience of having both and the differences in weight (if any) and if the maple cap and tone block make considerable tone differences etc?

Im defiantly looking at getting one.. just wanted a little more insight before I begin the hunt for one.

Thanks
 
I have a BFR Burl that’s lighter than the LIII that I sold after I received the Burl. There isn’t any tone differences between the two with both having the same pickups.
I think you will be happy with either.
 
I have a LIII (full Rosewood neck) and a BFR. I don't notice any weight difference. Generally speaking the tone is similar but I find the BFR to be slightly richer sounded. Both are awesome
 
Interesting insights! I have an all rosewood necked silhouette ... I like it but prefer the roasted maple feel, so it will defiantly be a BFR hazel or a bodhi blue .. first time ive used a floating trem as well and was surprised how much I was into it.
 
The rosewood necks are NIIICEEE. Though I don't really have much of a basis for comparison, as I only have one Luke III
 
Back
Top