nobozos
Well-known member
Hey Norrin, I can see your point, so here are a couple examples of what I'm talkin' about.
PRS used to use REAL Abalone inlay for thier birds and such, now it is a thin film.
PRS used to use different tuners, they have switched recently to "Low Mass" tuners.
The new PRS trems are different than the old ones. I believe the old ones were one piece, and the new ones are two.
The neck heel has been extended on the newer ones. The company line on this is that it was done to eliminate a "Dead Spot" on the neck by increasing the mass of the neck near the joint. Some have said that it was extended when they moved to their mass production facility to aid in the production of the guitar.
Now, I'm not saying that PRS isn't a good guitar, but they have changed production methods, and hardware since 1994 when they switched to a production line mentality. PRS claims these changes were made for the better, but if you play a pre-1994 PRS and compare it to a new one, I think you'll notice a difference.
PRS used to use REAL Abalone inlay for thier birds and such, now it is a thin film.
PRS used to use different tuners, they have switched recently to "Low Mass" tuners.
The new PRS trems are different than the old ones. I believe the old ones were one piece, and the new ones are two.
The neck heel has been extended on the newer ones. The company line on this is that it was done to eliminate a "Dead Spot" on the neck by increasing the mass of the neck near the joint. Some have said that it was extended when they moved to their mass production facility to aid in the production of the guitar.
Now, I'm not saying that PRS isn't a good guitar, but they have changed production methods, and hardware since 1994 when they switched to a production line mentality. PRS claims these changes were made for the better, but if you play a pre-1994 PRS and compare it to a new one, I think you'll notice a difference.