• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

Charles

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
130
Am I the only one? Somehow the look of just a bare headstock has always been more appealing to me than the painted ones.
 

brasco68

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
2,632
Location
Los Angeles, Ca
For me it depends on what color paint is on the guitar...I have both, but I tend prefer matching...especially on my Dargie.
 

Larry

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
3,687
Location
Iowa
I use to be matching only but now I'm starting to dig natural/non matching
 

TNT

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
3,576
Location
Oakland - Raider Nation!
Charles,

Yeah, I was a "natural/bare headstock only!

However, with "certain" body style and paint, I actually prefer black or matching (like on my MM Tabacco Burst Axis!!)
 

fatoni

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
252
natural is the only way to go...unless painted is the only way to go:confused:i would have killed for a white jp6 with inlays and piezo. turns out at the time i bought mine there was only one white jp6 in california and it was "loaded" so i could either spend all my money to have a guitar immediately or wait and probably spend more money for less(because its ordered i cant be the poor college student lowballer that i am). not to mention the wait.
 

jappy

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
225
Location
Sydney, Australia
I only like natural headstocks with a maple neck. The light coloured headstock next to a dark rosewood neck doesn't look as good personally.
 

fatoni

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
252
purely on an aesthetic level, matching tops and headstocks look better. i think there is this form over function thing for me that makes the natural cooler and percieved as better. its less of an art piece and more of a tool for making art. music man doesnt make classically good looking guitars (read not gibson or fender) but i do always associate them with the highest quality and class regardless of headstock
 

dstockden

Well-known member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
764
Location
England
On Jps Matching, Silo(and specs) and Al's Non matching, Lukes, normally non although the 07 Blue Dawn with matching is amazing looking! axis, depends.
 

starsky

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
439
Location
Scotland
Depends on the colour, fretboard wood and model for me. I'm not so keen on matching headstocks with solid colours.

There are no rules, just what looks good to you! ;)

Both my Lukes have natural headstocks as I prefer them that way with their particular body colours.

My Axis is matching, as is my Dargie Petrruci. I think I liked them that way because you can still see the wood grain on the Axis, and the Pet is sparkly in the right light.

So I'm 2-2 on my guitars so far :D
 

fogman

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
12,067
Location
ontario
Natty headstocks all the way!!!!

Though with guitars like the EVH, Axis, Petrucci & Bongo, they almost require matching to look right. I think that's because the guitars are very original and don't look like your typical strats and such of which most of us are acustomed to seeing natural.
 

fsmith

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
2,297
Location
Halethorpe, MD
Unless there's no choice, i.e. my BFR Luke and LE Silo Spec, it's always a natural headstock for me, and a rosewood fretboard...
 

travs

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
729
Location
sea.wa
its a win/win. the buttercream with the wine colored logos is striking. dare I say it looks like a fancy cake.
 

paranoid70

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
2,647
Location
Long Beach, CA
To me it depends upon the color of the guitar. If the guitar is a solid color, I think a matching headstock looks really cool. However, for guitars with the "burst" color scheme, I like the look of the natural headstock.
 

MusicManJP6

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
1,453
Location
Greenville, SC
matching headstock is so cool! It is a unique feature not offered by most brands. I really like it! I don't care for the non-matching, but it looks OK on certain color guitars. I also like natural headstocks on maple guitars like my strat copy Peavey...
 

Norrin Radd

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Messages
2,902
Location
Saint Paul
I like........BOTH! It completely depends on the guitar for me. I don't care for an Axis without matching. In ALs, I prefer matching with bursts and natural with solids. On the 20th Silos I like matching with maple fingerboards and natural without. On the Y2Ds I like the natural because it shows off the cool HS logo better. On JPs, I like the matching. On regular Silos - either way, On LEs I like the matching. So many exceptions and rules...........I just like what I like.
 

JMB27

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
1,000
Location
Ontario
On my Super Sport with the natural finish, I am really digging the matching natural headstock :D

..... and, on my Super Sport with the Honey Burst finish .... I am really digging the matching Honey Burst headstock:D

cheers always, eh

Joel
 

robelinda2

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Messages
9,330
Location
Diamond Creek, VIC, Australia- at Rancho Alberto
Natty headstocks all the way!!!!

Though with guitars like the EVH, Axis, Petrucci & Bongo, they almost require matching to look right. I think that's because the guitars are very original and don't look like your typical strats and such of which most of us are acustomed to seeing natural.

so i take it when you get an AL it will have natty head........08 is the year Fogman!! Join our great club!
 
Top Bottom