• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

JB1

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
1,292
See below description from Ebay. Is this accurate regarding the finish or is he just biggin it up?

1995 Fretless Stingray. This is pretty much a standard Stingray fretless 4 (with 3 EQ) .. except for the finish - The finish is a satin Natural finish that was, apparently, originally requested by Paul McCartney for his EB Stingray – it’s a very nice feeling / playing bass and a much more mellow sounding MM then the standard ‘gloss’ versions: much better for fretless and enabling those Palladino tones with ease. The Neck and fingerboard have almost no wear at all. Comes with a new set of DR Sunbeams and the original Musicman case.
 

oldbluebassman

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Messages
539
Location
Surrey UK
Ha ha ha :D :D :D

The only satin finish that improves my tone is when I've been satin a bar for 2 hours before I have to play.

This has got to be a wind-up.
 

SteveB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
6,192
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
JB1,

The only way that claim could hold any water is if Music Man used a different wood for those guitars because of the transparent finish. Perhaps a different wood could affect the tone as described, but I really doubt the actual paint could. Only Eric Johnson could hear the difference between paints. ;)
 

tkarter

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
5,921
Location
Kansas
To be honest I have never heard any difference in woods. I always figured it was the strings, setup and player that provided a tone.

I know all of the above mentioned combo sounds better after a few.


Well to me any way


tk
 

JB1

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
1,292
It tickled me too to be honest, but then I had a moment of uncertainty!

Glad you fellas came along & restored my sanity.

Bloomin' ridiculous isn't it?

"It won't sound as good if it's shiny...." :D
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,197
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
I bet Eric Johnson could hear the difference.
























Note to those who do not know me well: I am being sarcastic. Thank you.
 

SteveB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
6,192
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
I dunno, Jack.. when I made that same comment about EJ, I was being SERIOUS!
;)

But then, only Eric Johnson would care about how much the paint was influencing the tone. :)
 

Rod Trussbroken

Moderator
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
5,209
Location
Bris Vegas. AUSTRALIA.
I've read discussions on how instruments may vary in sound with respect to the body woods and finishes used.

But this is the first time I've seen Gloss versus Satin.

I'm assuming the Satin finish on EB Basses is polyester (just as the Gloss finish).

I knew Sir Paul had Sterlings but didn't know he had 'Rays. Either way, does anyone have a pic of him playing EBs?
 

JB1

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
1,292
Can't help you there Gav, but I'd like to know who this Eric Johnson fella is....
 

dlloyd

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2004
Messages
1,733
Location
Scotland
JB1 said:
Can't help you there Gav, but I'd like to know who this Eric Johnson fella is....

Guitarist who can tell the tonal difference between Ever Readies and Duracells in his effects pedals. Supposedly. :cool:
 

sandaas

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
232
Location
Lillehammer, Norway
JB1 said:
much more mellow sounding MM then the standard ‘gloss’ versions: much better for fretless and enabling those Palladino tones with ease.


hehehe, if that was true think what would happen when the first scratch came along :p

my o' my..

:D :D
 

JB1

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
1,292
dlloyd said:
Guitarist who can tell the tonal difference between Ever Readies and Duracells in his effects pedals. Supposedly. :cool:

No THAT has gotta be a wind up.

Is he also one of these blind piano tuner types that can hear a mouse fart from a mile away?
:D
 
Top Bottom