• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

lowstrung

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
96
Location
Texas
Can anyone explain the pro's and con's of long scale, mid scale, and short scale. Why would you purchase a short scale over a long scale? Is a short scale easier to play? Do they sound differant?
 

Aussie Mark

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
5,646
Location
Sydney, Australia
Short scale (30.5" from nut to bridge saddle) is "easier" to play if you have small hands/fingers. They're a good learner's bass, especially for teenage girls, young boys, or for guitarists wanting to get into bass. Short scale don't have the sustain or "piano like" tone that good long scale basses have, and it's quite difficult to find a short scale bass that has a decent thump from the E string. Cons are that you have less string brands/types to choose from, and short scale strings are often not sold in your local music shop. Examples of well known short scale basses are the Gibson EB series (EB-0, EB-3 - solid bodies, EB-2 - semi hollow body), Epiphone Rivoli (semi hollow body), Hofner "Beatle" bass and copies (eg. Epiphone Viola), Fender Mustang, Fender Musicmaster, Gibson Les Paul Triumph/Recording.

Medium scale is very uncommon indeed. I think the scale length is around 32". Rickenbackers fall somewhere between medium and long scale, at around 33" scale (from memory)

Long scale (34" - 5 stringers are often 35") is by far the most common scale. Virtually every major bass manufacturer's best known models are long scale - Musicman/Ernie Ball (all of them) Fender Precision, Fender Jazz, Gibson Thunderbird, Gibson's current Les Pauls, Epiphone Jack Cassady, Lakland. The list goes on. Long scale strings are easy to buy in many different types and gauges.

Then again, bigger is better, so you could always try and find something with a 39" scale, like my Scroll bass :D

scroll.jpg
 

lowstrung

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
96
Location
Texas
Thanks Mark,

So the way I understand it is. You give up good tone for playability. The longer scale you can master the better you will sound. I like that long scale scroll bass of yours.

Mike
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,190
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
The longer scale you can master the better you will sound.

I think that's a bit oversimplified. Plenty of 34" basses sound as good if not better than an equal number of 35" basses.

Someone, I think, just likes to show us his long-scale tool, if you ask me!

:)
 

bassmonkeee

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
4,628
Location
Decatur, GA
bovinehost said:
I think that's a bit oversimplified. Plenty of 34" basses sound as good if not better than an equal number of 35" basses.

Someone, I think, just likes to show us his long-scale tool, if you ask me!

:)

Not that we think anyone is compensating for anything. ;)

Honestly, I've not heard a 35" scale, or longer, bass that had as good a B string as my 34" scale US Curbow. At least, I haven't heard one that had a better sounding B string.

Not to mention, that super long scale 'D' and 'G' strings generally sound worse to my ears on electric basses.
 

Morrow

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
469
Location
Halifax NS
I have three shortscale hollowbody basses, an old Hofner, A Danp Longhorn, and a Rivoli.The Hofner and the Rivoli have serious thump.The Dano is a cheap little thing that's fun to play and sounds pretty good too.I generally put a couple of hours on one before I take it to a gig because most of my playing is on longscales or an upright.They are fun basses .Just the ticket if you want something different.
 
Top Bottom