Purple ASS
Well-known member
Apologies if this has been discussed in the past but I did do a search and came up with nothing
I've often wondered what the thinking is behind the signature guitars. I am intrigued as to why EBMM has in the past elected to dedicate a whole guitar model to a particular artist as opposed to a model with a signature artist ie (example) a Silhouette 'Johnny Hiland'. I do of course understand how the JP, Morse and the Luke have been built to their specifations and to have the loyalty of this calibre of artist on board must be priceless, but it occured to me that with the introduction of all those mouthwatering HH AL's with Rosey necks that they have become a very different guitar to that which Albert is really likely to be seen playing and the only thing in common is the shape. I hope I'm wrong, I'd love to see him on one. The guy whole sold me mine described it as a great country guitar. He's right of course, but even in it's standard guise it's so much more than that. It'll do everything a S***t will do and a whole lot more. I wonder how many members of the public choose not to buy a model because of its association with a particular artist and would other high profile artists ever be seen with another artists signature axe as their main choice ? (Steve Vai on a Petrucci ? ) Will we ever see future signature models dedicated in this way again, or will we see ( for example) The Reflex "Joe Bonamassa". Again, this is no critisism as the business model obviously works and BP must be very happy, just looking at it from a punters' point of view. Funny story is, my sons band were rehearsing yesterday, the lead singer /guitarist commented that it was a great looking 'Indie' guitar and would be a far more suitable replacement for the other guitarists completely 'non Indie' looking PRS Modern Eagle
I've often wondered what the thinking is behind the signature guitars. I am intrigued as to why EBMM has in the past elected to dedicate a whole guitar model to a particular artist as opposed to a model with a signature artist ie (example) a Silhouette 'Johnny Hiland'. I do of course understand how the JP, Morse and the Luke have been built to their specifations and to have the loyalty of this calibre of artist on board must be priceless, but it occured to me that with the introduction of all those mouthwatering HH AL's with Rosey necks that they have become a very different guitar to that which Albert is really likely to be seen playing and the only thing in common is the shape. I hope I'm wrong, I'd love to see him on one. The guy whole sold me mine described it as a great country guitar. He's right of course, but even in it's standard guise it's so much more than that. It'll do everything a S***t will do and a whole lot more. I wonder how many members of the public choose not to buy a model because of its association with a particular artist and would other high profile artists ever be seen with another artists signature axe as their main choice ? (Steve Vai on a Petrucci ? ) Will we ever see future signature models dedicated in this way again, or will we see ( for example) The Reflex "Joe Bonamassa". Again, this is no critisism as the business model obviously works and BP must be very happy, just looking at it from a punters' point of view. Funny story is, my sons band were rehearsing yesterday, the lead singer /guitarist commented that it was a great looking 'Indie' guitar and would be a far more suitable replacement for the other guitarists completely 'non Indie' looking PRS Modern Eagle