• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan

zEch1

Active member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
28
Location
Europe, Austria
bit more highs on the higher strings and bit more lows on the lower strings! same thing on a F****r P where one half of the split coil is closer to the neck and the other one closer to the bridge. and yes, it is realy as easy as it sounds :D
 

Jim C

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
227
I had always assumed it was about tonal balance between high strings and low, yet Spector switches the relationship of the split pup on some of their instruments

I suspect that with active EQ there are more variables at play
 

oli@bass

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
4,272
Location
Switzerland
Probably because we generally play further down on the neck for the lower strings and higher up on the neck for the higher strings. Thus a slanted pickup would sort of balance the pickup spot for the fretted string length.

Other than that, I always felt that it's slanted in the wrong direction... I'd assume that to balance the harmonic spectrum of strings the fat ones would need more higher harmonics and the thin ones would need more root note.
 

zEch1

Active member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
28
Location
Europe, Austria
Other than that, I always felt that it's slanted in the wrong direction... I'd assume that to balance the harmonic spectrum of strings the fat ones would need more higher harmonics and the thin ones would need more root note.

Guess that's why a certain German company reversed the position of their split coil compared to the classic position.

AFAIK that was also an important part of J.Hendrix unique sound. Since he turned a normal St**t upside down to play it left handed he had his E string where the G shoud be and so on. Therefore had longer lower strings and shorter higher strings and also the angled splitcoil reversed.

sry for non MM off topic talk btw!:)
 
Last edited:

Jim C

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
227
AFAIK that was also an important part of J.Hendrix unique sound. Since he turned a normal St**t upside down to play it left handed he had his E string where the G shoud be and so on. Therefore had longer lower strings and shorter higher strings and also the angled splitcoil reversed.

Wow, so obvious although I never had considered it
The again, he probably could get his sound on any guitar being from another planet and all
 

RocketRalf

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
1,119
Location
Sydney
You need more fundamental from the low strings (the root of the chord) and more harmonics from the high strings to cut trough, I think.
 

adouglas

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 12, 2005
Messages
5,592
Location
On the tail end of the bell curve in Connecticut
My own concept of this also relates to harmonics.

When a string is plucked, the whole harmonic series is set off all at the same time. When we draw this on paper we often just show a single mode of vibration... here's a drawing of a string with several harmonic modes represented separately.

250px-Harmonic_partials_on_strings.svg.png


In reality it's a much more complicated motion because all of the harmonics are represented at once.

You can filter out harmonics by touching the string at the various harmonic nodes (i.e. you can filter out the base vibration by touching the string at the 12th fret, leaving only the first harmonic and the even-numbered ones above it, and so on).

If you put the pickup close to the end of the string, you get a similar effect (I think). The closer to the bridge you are, the lower-order harmonics are not as well represented because the pickup can't "see" them. Hence the thinner, more trebly sound of bridge pickups, even though the note being played is the same.

By angling the pickup, the treble side is primarily "seeing" a higher-order harmonic than the bass side. So you get more prominent higher-harmonic overtones on the treble side than on the bass side.

Does that make sense to anyone but me?
 

oli@bass

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
4,272
Location
Switzerland
By angling the pickup, the treble side is primarily "seeing" a higher-order harmonic than the bass side. So you get more prominent higher-harmonic overtones on the treble side than on the bass side.

Does that make sense to anyone but me?

Yes. Your explanation is more or less what I tried to say as well. However, the question remains is: Why? Why make the bass strings sound duller and the treble strings sound brighter? Especially since the bass strings are sounding duller by nature due to their higher mass... the "Strat" pickup angle is expanding the difference between the strings, while I'd try to equalize their difference.
 

mynan

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
2,685
Location
Spring Lake, MI
Yes. Your explanation is more or less what I tried to say as well. However, the question remains is: Why? Why make the bass strings sound duller and the treble strings sound brighter? Especially since the bass strings are sounding duller by nature due to their higher mass... the "Strat" pickup angle is expanding the difference between the strings, while I'd try to equalize their difference.

Maybe being that close to the bridge, the bass strings would be too thin-sounding if they were as close to the bridge as the treble strings. Maybe the treble strings gain something (brightness, twang, whatever) by being that close to the bridge.
 

bovinehost

Administrator
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
18,197
Location
Dall-Ass, TX
Dudley said, "....it changes the harmonic content of what the pickup "sees". Typically it's angled to make the low strings fatter and the high strings brighter."

He also asked rhetorically why dogs performed a certain action....but perhaps that isn't relevant.
 
Top Bottom