• Ernie Ball
  • MusicMan
  • Sterling by MusicMan
Status
Not open for further replies.

Big Poppa

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
18,598
Location
Coachella & SLO, California
Guess what all you marketing experts we considered the name when we did it. it was right before we felol on our heads...dont you think saying Dumb is not really nice?
 

r goldsmith

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
167
Location
Australia
Yes, rude indeed, and besides just inaccurate to use such terms. I'm no marketing expert either, but I get it completely, and think it's a great strategy. Well done Mr Ball, I say.
 

Beth

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2002
Messages
2,910
Location
Indio
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet... c'mon guys, get over it!
 

T-bone

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
1,274
Great - now my daughter will want a Sterling (along with my wife). :D

Bravo BP & Co. Bravo. You never cease to amaze us.

tbone
 

GHWelles

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,375
Location
Rancho Mirage
I like it:

Father: Ernie Ball/Music Man brand

Son: Sterling by Music Man brand

Nice symmetry.

Also, in the new line the STERLING is very large, and so clearly denotes a brand in itself.

And frankly it is the same company holding these brands, so they strengthen the company identity I think.

I think it is so great they have a 5 string bass in the series. And the Petrucci trem.
 

Moose308

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
204
Location
British Columbia
Reading the thought process of the naming strategy, I can see how it makes sense.

While I don't agree with the name, I am sure it will all work out in the end.

I am very pleased to see you guys introduce this line. No bongo though. :-( I strongly suspect this will be a great addition to the MM line.
 

RobertB

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
1,657
Location
Denver area.
I think it is so great they have a 5 string bass in the series...

Me too. I prefer 4's, but I do enjoy having a 5 around. So just as this new series makes it more likely now that I'll buy a guitar, it also makes it much more likely that I'll go ahead and snag a 5'er.

Have to ask: In addition to distinguishing it as a 5'er, does the "35" in "Ray 35" also mean this one has a 35" scale, or is it the standard 34?
 

nicjimbass

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
223
Being a fan of matching headstocks, the Ray34's got me all excited. Nice to see the Ray35 as well. They look very much like the higher-end stuff... I think BP and the gang are really on their game right now.

BP- I for one am extremely grateful that you take time out of your busy schedule to share all this stuff with us- the development of new instruments, the introduction of new lines, and the like. Thank you!
 

bassmonkeee

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
4,628
Location
Decatur, GA
Me too. I prefer 4's, but I do enjoy having a 5 around. So just as this new series makes it more likely now that I'll buy a guitar, it also makes it much more likely that I'll go ahead and snag a 5'er.

Have to ask: In addition to distinguishing it as a 5'er, does the "35" in "Ray 35" also mean this one has a 35" scale, or is it the standard 34?

I doubt it. More likely it means 3 band EQ, 5 string. I can't imagine them developing a 35" scale specifically for the budget (for lack of a better word) line.
 

cjoz

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
21
Location
sydney
Can't help myself ... i think it's a great name and as the Aussie distributor, I don't think we'll have ANY problem with the marketing of it.
As usual, Sterling ... well done - they'd BOTH be proud - shame they're not around to witness this :)
 

Smakbass

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
443
Location
Vancouver BC
I think its a good name...I mean its Sterling By Musicman it seems clear to me that it would not be confused.
 

phat5

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
225
Location
From Santa Cruz Ca to North Liberty Iowa
Q: will the Ray 35, have the same neck size, radius and body contours as the SR5? I imagine the bridge & tuners, will be a better quality than the OLP shtuff. I'm looking forward to seeing these at the local GC!
 

RobertB

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
1,657
Location
Denver area.
I doubt it. More likely it means 3 band EQ, 5 string. I can't imagine them developing a 35" scale specifically for the budget (for lack of a better word) line.

On the contrary, most entry to mid-level 5 string basses implement a 35" scale as a "cheap" way to achieve decent tension and focus on the low B. Pulling it off on a 34" neck scale, and thereby preserving better playability (and tone, in the opinion of many), is a rare and admirable thing. It's a function of great design and manufacturing, and in my opinion it's one of the many things that makes the EBMM 5 string basses so special. It stands to reason that it might be difficult to do in a "budget" line (to use your word), hence, my question.

But you may be right. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom