thanks big mesa!
You're welcome! And the bass player will be playing his Stingray as well. We're a MM only band lol.
thanks big mesa!
YOu guys are inclined to think signature guitars because that has what has happened the last generation instead of research and development. It is a surface no brainer....HMMMMM WE need to lock this guy up...we will stroke his ego and put his name on the headstock...we will make it unique by sanding some paint off in a few spots and put different frets...hell maybe even a different pickup. The artist will sign a contract that is favored nations...he gets the same percentage as the other guys....he is now obligated to play that guitar at least 60% percent of the time.....its ego driven handcuffs.
I really respect Joe Bonamassa's approach. He has a non exclusive deal with Gibson. He happens to be loving our stuff. We make him whatever he wants but he could be gone tomorrow or he could be still playing it. The bottom line is that when you go see Joe B he is playing exactly the tool that he needs for inspiration. Let me make this clear...we have a string deal with Joe and nothing on the guitars except he is playing a bunch of our stuff now...that could change but it feels really good and pure to me.
There is a market for that....maybe. The problem is that at retail if a dealer stocked all the signature guitars available from the multitude of players there would be no room for the regular stuff...and the regular stuff is what usually sells.
We dont chose signature artists by sound scan or people magazine...(but a jp was all over american idol!) The player has to be an iconic player within his or her genre and most importantly have a desire for a instrument that isnt currently out there for them to help perfect thier art. Seriously. Then we go from there. There are no contracts. Any of our artists can leave at any time.
The net result is that the Luke and JP are very cucessful guitars in their price point and the Albert Lee and the Steve Morse are very credible offerings with a very nice following.
DOnt confuse endorsements with signature guitars. As Ive said recently Hendrix edidnt have one
As mesa says...an endorsement is different that a signature model
I don't care who plays EBMM as long as it's not the Jonas Brothers...![]()
This is a very telling post, even though I know you are just joking around. The Jonas Brothers write incredibly well crafted songs and sell millions of records.
Yeah.. endorsments are huge I think... I saw EVH and I thought.... that's weird but I kinda like it... then Luke went over and I wanted one of those!!!!! LOL But I really needed JP's switch layout and electronics so I went with that when I got my first 1K guitar... when he switched over I immediately felt he was in the place I wished he had been anyway.
I do wish the picasso had come over as an option but you have to move on sometime right? LOL
as i have said many times before, the only reason i discovered ebmm was the association with evh. I am sure that if the evh association had not happened i would not be playing these fine guitars today.
What about Alex Lifeson? He plays Les Pauls, 355s, Strats, Teles, PRS.... Somebody hand that man a Silhoutte Special!!! And Geddy would absolutely sound killer with a Stingray. (Yeah, I love Rush)
This going to get so loose so quick.
The question really needs to be refined...
Are you asking who the younger/up and coming artists are ??? ie DJ Ashba, Trev Lukather, Johnny Christ, Joe Bonamassa etc etc etc...
Or
Are you asking who the "big faces" are and have been since EVHs departure?? ie
It's a loaded question as it is currently phrased...
again... what does endorsements in general have to do with signature models?
I for one don't have a rule I go by as for playing signature or not signature... I don't care if the guitar says puke on it if it's the guitar that meets all my needs. LOL The Petrucci models have done that for me since I first played one of the um, old ones... lol... and the MM JP does even more so with the piezo, better build, and smaller tastier neck.
YOu guys are inclined to think signature guitars because that has what has happened the last generation instead of research and development. It is a surface no brainer....HMMMMM WE need to lock this guy up...we will stroke his ego and put his name on the headstock...we will make it unique by sanding some paint off in a few spots and put different frets...hell maybe even a different pickup. The artist will sign a contract that is favored nations...he gets the same percentage as the other guys....he is now obligated to play that guitar at least 60% percent of the time.....its ego driven handcuffs.
I really respect Joe Bonamassa's approach. He has a non exclusive deal with Gibson. He happens to be loving our stuff. We make him whatever he wants but he could be gone tomorrow or he could be still playing it. The bottom line is that when you go see Joe B he is playing exactly the tool that he needs for inspiration. Let me make this clear...we have a string deal with Joe and nothing on the guitars except he is playing a bunch of our stuff now...that could change but it feels really good and pure to me.
There is a market for that....maybe. The problem is that at retail if a dealer stocked all the signature guitars available from the multitude of players there would be no room for the regular stuff...and the regular stuff is what usually sells.
We dont chose signature artists by sound scan or people magazine...(but a jp was all over american idol!) The player has to be an iconic player within his or her genre and most importantly have a desire for a instrument that isnt currently out there for them to help perfect thier art. Seriously. Then we go from there. There are no contracts. Any of our artists can leave at any time.
The net result is that the Luke and JP are very cucessful guitars in their price point and the Albert Lee and the Steve Morse are very credible offerings with a very nice following.
DOnt confuse endorsements with signature guitars. As Ive said recently Hendrix edidnt have one
As mesa says...an endorsement is different that a signature model
Signature guitars are unique usually and that's the draw or appeal to people because they have features other guitars might not be offering.
I am talking about upcoming players who will be big one day and are skilled, not POP people.