once again till you redifine how the guitar is played ala evh you are just another player. jimi and clapton and evh are one in a million. flash dosent impress me.
that's what i'm talkin aboutThe video was hilarious! The author even took the time to throw a winking emoticon in his clip title so we'd know it was a joke.
well maybe the current clapton is questionable, but what isnt there to 'get' about the era he's most famous for? ( ie late 60's to mid 70's ) brilliant player, amazing phrasing, especially on the Cream albums, and even on the 24 nights live cd/dvd.
it's very important to ask yourself some questions ... can I play like that? can I play slow enough ? or can i play that fast? or can I play a music so people can smile everytime they hear your playing?.. and so on.
I've pretty much changed the way people play the guitar.
They hear me and then go and practice.
They usually say something like 'I need to make sure I never play like he does'
![]()
When rock players brought classical music onto the scene, it marked the end of the Clapton/Page/Hendrix/Santana era. They’re two entirely different schools.
Frankly, music that is played almost exclusively to other musicians nearly always loses me. Chops and respect for chops, sure, but at the end of this century ‘sunshine of your love’ will still be remembered and played (unlike today’s modern day guitar heroes) - not because Clapton was a better guitar player, but because his music simply is memorable to the soul. It sticks to the bones and doesn’t shred away.
I saw a clip here of Luke playing with Clapton and Santana. I felt embarrassed for the latter two. It was like watching Segovia jam with Muddy Waters. Does that mean Muddy Waters wasn’t a gifted musician, even as gifted as Segovia? How can you even begin to compare them?
I understand your point but when people mention Clapton, they do so in the vein of a player, not a songwriter. People who were influenced by him tend to say they were influenced by his playing and not that he wrote Pop music. EVH says he loved Clapton so much that he learned every Clapton lick he could. So in that regard, I don't understand Clapton's popularity. He's not technically gifted and I don't see what he changed. I just chalk it up to the fact that when he did whatever it is he did, it was unusual for the time. If he came out today, he might not get any more recognition as a guitar player, than say, John Mayer.
Yes, I think that's accurate to say. But I'm wondering if perhaps you weren't around when Clapton "introduced" blues rock to world? Not saying you weren't but it seems that if you were, then you should clearly understand the impact Clapton made upon electric guitar playing, even as we know it today.
Sound reproduction has come a long way since Thomas Edison, but he still invented the phonograph, and will be remembered long after Boston Acoustics is forgotten.