EasyTiger
Well-known member
Congrats man that's a fine looking bass, and I guess it go's pretty damn fast
RR doesn't photo well at all. I have tried it all over the place, different camera settings, lighting... you name it. The sparkles in there just have to be seen... great color, brighter than CAR and it shifts quite a bit in the lighting (due to the sparkles).Fuzzy Dustmite said:Is that a pretty accurate version of Radiance Red? I've seen different pictures and it always looks a little different in each one.
Never stick anything smaller than a Hammond organ in your ear canal.Mobay45 said:Bootiful. Just bootiful.
Be careful with that double H. It can hurt your ears.
I'd like to remark here that the resemblance is remarkable. Is this a breeding pair?82Daion said:The family:
![]()
tadawson said:How well does the headstock color match the body? I like Radiance (a LOT) but the only one I have seen was at GC, and the headstock and neck color were more of a burgundy, and did not match the body color at all . . . .
- Tim
Golem said:I'd like to remark here that the resemblance is remarkable. Is this a breeding pair?
82Daion said:The bass:
![]()
The family:
![]()
HUH? How was the lighting? Huh? Another urban legend in the making...GC hasnt ordered any radience red matching headstocktadawson said:How well does the headstock color match the body? I like Radiance (a LOT) but the only one I have seen was at GC, and the headstock and neck color were more of a burgundy, and did not match the body color at all . . . .
- Tim
Big Poppa said:HUH? How was the lighting? Huh? Another urban legend in the making...GC hasnt ordered any radience red matching headstock
tadawson said:The lighting was OK - it was in the "Quiet Room" but is was flourescents. What I noticed the most is that the body had the metallic, and the neck/headstock did not. They had it tagged as the Radiance Limited, but unless I am desperately in need of a clue, the limited should have had a black headstock. Tagged as new, too . . . . so I dunno what to tell you, BP, the tag was pretty clear, and it looked like the right body color to me . . . and not used, unless mismarked . . . . And PLEASE don't take this as GC bashing! I only mentioned it 'cuz that's where it was!
Actually, I was a little bummed . . . had it been the true Limited, I would have probably walked out with it. It was a 5HH, IIRC . . . .
Next time I get over there, I'll see if it's still there and get a serial number, just to make sure that I am not just going insane . . . . (or maybe it's too late? Bongo fever can be pretty catchy, after all, and makes us all do crazy things with our dough . . . )
- Tim
oddjob said:RR doesn't photo well at all. I have tried it all over the place, different camera settings, lighting... you name it. The sparkles in there just have to be seen... great color, brighter than CAR and it shifts quite a bit in the lighting (due to the sparkles).
smallequestrian said:Tim, if thats the one in the quiet room at the GC on LBJ, then its actually a Candy Red.
Colin said:Tim , maybe if you post the store location BP will find out for sure?
Steve Dude Barr said:Ping Jack if you want to trade in that Daion on another Bongo.